Andrés Manuel López Obrador with Delfina Gómez Andrés Manuel López Obrador with Delfina Gómez, who narrowly lost the Mexico state governor’s race on June 4. Carlos Jasso/REUTERS

A firebrand leftist riles the powers that be

The rise of Morena will mean a tumultous presidential election in 2018

With its 17 million people the State of México, which encompasses the outer suburbs of sprawling Mexico City, tends to have an impact in national elections that goes far beyond its borders.

ADVERTISEMENT

The behemoth central state, which accounts for some 14% of Mexico’s population, commands significant resources and is President Enrique Peña Nieto’s political bastion.

All eyes were on it during the June 4 gubernatorial elections, which pitted the upstart left-wing party Morena, founded by Andrés Manuel López Obrador (aka “AMLO” locally), the firebrand former mayor of Mexico City and two-time presidential candidate, against Peña Nieto’s Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI).

In the end, Morena’s Delfina Gómez came within three percentage points of her opponent, Alfredo del Mazo, but failed to break the PRI’s stronghold. The narrow result, which Morena immediately contested, sets the stage for a tumultuous 2018 presidential election.

Though the PRI won the gubernatorial election, it faced fierce competition this time around. The crowded field included political heavy-hitters such as Josefina Vázquez Mota of the centre-right National Action Party (which won the presidency in 2000, bringing Mexico its first-ever non-PRI government), and Juan Zepeda from the Democratic Revolution Party, a centre-left party born in the 1980s as a splinter of the PRI.

There were also several independent and minor-party candidates.

Surveys had long predicted a two-way race between Gómez, a former teacher and mayor of the city of Texcoco, and del Mazo. The tight margin of victory – and López Obrador’s subsequent cries of fraud – will amplify the stories of malfeasance that plagued the last weeks of the campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Among alleged scandals, Vázquez Mota’s family was accused of financial fraud, Gómez was said to have demanded payment from former staffers to benefit a local party boss and even Obrador’s closest circle was alleged to be involved in an illicit transfer of funds.

All these accusations, and the illegal behavior that may or may not underlie them, diminish Mexicans’ trust in elections and divide the electorate between winners and losers, accusers and accused.

López Obrador, a practiced populist, is talented in making lemonade out of lemons. He may well be able to capitalize on Gómez’ defeat by repeating a local version of the national scandal he orchestrated after his own presidential defeat in 2006.

To some, that months-long protest polarized public opinion and confirmed that he posed a danger to Mexico’s democracy, as the PAN leadership then claimed. But, among his base, it garnered him wild support.

López Obrador will surely be running for president again in 2018 in his third attempt to capture the office. And Delfina Gómez’s strong finish shows that Morena is a force to be reckoned with.

Currently, surveys give López Obrador the best chance of winning the 2018 election. When compared to any other possible candidate that pollsters can think of, including ex-president Felipe Calderón’s wife and some high-ranking PRI officials, he comes out at least 5% ahead.

But he has been in this favourable position before and still narrowly lost two presidential elections (2006 and 2012). If elected, Obrador has promised to end corruption and to govern for the poor and underserved.

In a country with the poverty rate at 46% and average trust in government at 5.1 on a scale of 10, such changes would be welcome.

Other policy proposals are tougher. López Obrador has also suggested referenda on recent decisions legalizing marriage equality and adoption by same-sex couples, and wants to raise the minimum wage and retirement pensions without raising taxes or increasing the deficit.

He also plans to hold a referendum to potentially roll back recent energy reforms that allowed private investors into the oil market, which had been state-run since the 1930s.

Such promises have fueled comparisons between AMLO and the late president of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez. And this makes markets – and many Mexicans – jittery.

López Obrador’s rise has always come with rabble-rousing, both after he lost the 1994 Tabasco governor’s race and when demanding reparations for environmental damage caused by oil spills on indigenous lands.

At a 2006 campaign event, he repeatedly said to then-president Vicente Fox (PAN), “¡Cállate chachalaca!” or “Shut up, you cawing bird!” This elicited laughter from the crowd but dismayed more serious observers. It also led the PAN to first liken López Obrador to Hugo Chávez.

Ultimately, López Obrador lost to the PAN’s Felipe Calderón by less than 0.5%, about 250,000 votes. He called on his supporters to protest the results, for weeks blockaded Reforma Avenue, one of Mexico City’s main thoroughfares and eventually began calling himself the “legitimate president of Mexico.”

But current events and political strategy have conspired to tame AMLO’s fire. His response to losing to Enrique Peña Nieto in 2012, this time by more than 6%, was much less angry.

More recently, the rise and eventual election of United States President Donald Trump, with his anti-Mexico rhetoric, served to boost López Obrador’s prospects as he has been riding the rising tide of Mexican nationalism.

Touring the U.S. in Februray 2017, he defended Mexican immigrants and proposed to reduce the northward flow by improving living standards in Mexico after “three decades of neo-liberal governments”.

But the firebrand, anti-establishment AMLO must also tread carefully to avoid any comparisons with the firebrand, anti-establishment Trump, who has become odious to Mexicans.

This may have inspired his shifting position on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which Trump has threatened to repeal. In 2006, AMLO promised to restore import tariffs on American corn and beans. Now he says he will wait to take a position on NAFTA after winning the election.

In Washington, the prospect of an AMLO victory next year seems to have sped up NAFTA negotiations. The Trump administration knows what Peña Nieto wants in a trade deal; who knows what AMLO thinks?

Some financial analysts believe that a López Obrador presidency could bring economic instability to Mexico and beyond. The exchange rate of the peso, with its sensitive barometric properties, concurs.

On Mexico state’s election day it registered the probable victory of Morena, losing value after polls closed only to gain 1.46% when preliminary tallies handed victory to Del Mazo.

The candidate has said that he’s no Chávez and that businesses have nothing to worry about. In keeping, his party is carefully calibrating its image.

Recently, Morena hosted the Venezuelan ambassador, who expressed her gratitude for the party’s solidarity with the Bolivarian regime on Twitter, only to delete the tweets later. López Obrador’s party denounced the whole event as fake and underscored Morena’s non-interventionist foreign policy.

The ConversationSome supporters will miss the old firebrand when López Obrador makes his third run for the presidency. Can he square their desires with the sensibilities of the peso?

Salvador Vázquez del Mercado is a lecturer on public opinion and research methodology at the National Autonomous University of México. This article was originally published on The Conversation.

Stories from our archives that you might enjoy

  • David L. Allison

    The article clearly demonstrates the influence of US lobbyists and political consultants working to undercut AMLO’s support. The attacks on Morena are subtle but effective in raising fears of socialism, economic justice and foreign influence from central and south America. No concern is shown in the article for the influence of the US government and neoliberal politicians from up north.

    • cooncats

      Actually David, the fears come from what AMLO himself has said. You will notice he is trying to be more circumspect of late. That should fool no one, the guy really is a Hugo Chavez. If you want to wreck the Mexican economy and get that wall built in short order, elect him.

      The U.S. boogeyman has very little influence on the politics in this country. At this point in time the government there is mainly focused on stopping the lawbreaking at the border and controlling the damage to the U.S. from this obviously failed state. It is too bad these leftist politicians can’t control their egos as putting only one up against the PRI in Mexico would have resulted in certain victory even with the usual PRI ballot fraud and vote buying.

      Morena and PRD did it to themselves. Don’t blame every damn thing that comes along on the U.S.

      • Commander Barkfeather

        Obviously, you don’t read the comments of K. Chris C. (This is a joke!) Seriously, if you keep an open mind, would a President López Obrador be all that bad for Mexico? When the policies of the present administration are not working for whatever reason, it may be time to pull over and let somebody else drive for a while. For that matter, given the present state of things in Venezuela, I’m beginning to long for the good old days of Hugo Chavez. Both men are probably not good for US policy, but then again, that is not their function.

        • cooncats

          Well Hugo caused what has happened in Venezuela maybe you missed that part? It all started with his election.

          Almost anything is better for Mexico than more PRI. Frankly I was very disappointed when the PRD and Morena divided their vote, stupidly, and lost. Taking the power base of Mexico away from the PRI would have really weakened them. AMLO however is a poor choice IMO, his ego is so big it is dangerous and I don’t trust him.

          But at this point, it is hard not to feel that anyone but PRI is preferable not only nationally but also at the state and local level. I live in a failing municipio that has been looted by the PRI so I have a rather jaundiced view of that bunch these days.

  • AMLO’s cries of fraud? He always cries fraud after a loss. The only honest election in his mind is when he wins.

  • cooncats

    If the PRD and Morena split their vote again, they will lose. As for AMLO getting rid of corruption in this country he would have to shoot at least 90 percent of the political class here. Nope, won’t happen, there will just be a new batch of pigs at the public feeding trough.

  • K. Chris C.

    This unicorn puppet steals with his left hand. The other unicorn puppet steals with his right.

    An American citizen, not US subject.

  • Güerito

    Missing from most critiques of AMLO is any discussion of his actual record in office as the Mayor of Mexico City (2000-2005).

    He was a very successful Mayor and left office with about an 80% approval rating.

    • cooncats

      Good point and thanks for the reminder.

  • kallen

    Promising to “raise the minimum wage and retirement pensions without raising taxes or increasing the deficit” is what all central and south Amercan leftists do to get elected: make give-away promises. And once elected the countries go down the toilet. Look at Venezuela, look at Argentina, look at Brazil.

  • monroe doctrine

    Vote for Pedro!

  • AMLO proved himself to be a good administrator when he was Jefe of Mexico City. He implemented real changes that helped poor and retired people. I voted for him before and I will vote for him again. Neither the PAN nor the PRI have done anything to address low wages and income disparity in Mexico. It is too bad that he cannot make up with the PRD because I think that if that vote was not divided he would win.

FreeCurrencyRates.com
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT