The vaquita porpoise: on the verge of extinction. The vaquita porpoise: on the verge of extinction. Thomas A. Jefferson/VIVA Vaquita

Conservation groups call for shrimp boycott

Consumers urged to boycott Mexican shrimp in measure to save vaquita porpoise

Conservation organizations in the United States today announced a boycott of Mexican shrimp in order to pressure the Mexican government to take action to save the vaquita porpoise.


“Mexican fisheries agencies have known how to save the vaquita for years, but they’ve failed to take the necessary actions, protecting industry profits rather than this critically endangered species,” said Kate O’Connell, marine wildlife consultant at the Animal Welfare Institute.

The “Boycott Mexican Shrimp” campaign is supported by some 50 U.S. and international organizations, a press conference was told this morning, including the Animal Welfare Institute, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The boycott announcement comes three days before the opening in Boston of Seafood Expo North America, one of the world’s biggest seafood industry trade shows. The call for a boycott will be promoted with a mobile billboard outside the show and at the local headquarters of Trader Joe’s, described as one of the biggest retailers of Mexican shrimp.

The campaign’s website offers tools to help consumers identify Mexican shrimp products and participate in the boycott efforts.

An estimated 30 vaquitas are all that remain of the small porpoise, found only in the waters of the upper Sea of Cortéz. Its numbers have been decimated over many years by shrimp gillnets in which they become entangled, and more recently by gillnets used illegally to catch the totoaba, whose swim bladder is a delicacy in Asia.

Conservation groups believe the vaquita will become extinct within two years and that a permanent gillnet ban is needed to save the porpoise, along with enforcement.


A two-year ban on gillnet fishing in the area inhabited by the vaquita was implemented in 2015 but a statement released today by conservation groups describes enforcement efforts as “dismal.”

“Illegal fishing is widespread throughout vaquita habitat, including by shrimp vessels that continue to ply the waters of the Vaquita Refuge — a no fishing zone.”

The gillnet ban, part of a billion-peso program that paid fishermen not to fish, ends next month and the government has not indicated if it will be extended.

A new strategy announced earlier this year by the federal government and the International Committee for the Recovery of the Vaquita is to capture the remaining animals and provide them with a safe environment in which they can breed.

But the shrimp boycott supporters feel that the gillnet ban is the vaquita’s last hope.

“This is the vaquita’s very last chance,” said Sarah Uhlemann, international program director with the Center for Biological Diversity. “For decades, Mexican officials have failed the vaquita, and now only the strongest of actions will get their attention. To save these wonderful little porpoises, we have to boycott Mexican shrimp.”

U.S. shrimp imports from Mexico totaled 25,327 tonnes last year.

Sinaloa is the source of 70% of Mexico’s wild shrimp production at more than 48,000 tonnes. It has the largest shrimp-fishing fleet in the Pacific Ocean, with more than 638 deep-sea vessels, according to ProMéxico, the federal agency that promotes trade and investment.

Mexico News Daily

Stories from our archives that you might enjoy

  • Patricia Conner

    i love protecting the vaquita and have donated a subtantial sum. but i do not believe this article. Mexico has lead the charge to protect them. second, the fishermen had to give up fishing and now shrimping. humans are also part of the animal kingdom. they need to survive too. third, these 50 USA organizations lecture people and blame but do not seem to get involved actively. i.e the gil nets are blamed although new one was made that seems to work in the rest of the world. no money or re-schooling of the fishermeen – just blame. even the cartel was blamed. why did these groups not mixed with the mexicans efforts , financial and even the scientific community? my answer is the same as the cause. i am blaming but i feel that the blame on the conservative groups and not the mexicans is fair.

    • TioDon

      what she said.

  • E. Rubio

    I have a lot of family in San Felipe. I was just there and this has created devastation in the once thriving Fisherman Village. It is sad to see so many shops closed down and soon enough it will look like a Ghost Town if the Mexican Government continues not to allow people to fish. Fishing is 90% of the livelihood of San Felipe. People must unite to convince the Mexican Government to help these people. Pay them what they deserve. Yes, we want protection of Animals. But there must be a compromise. For many generations, since as early as the 1930’s the men in my family and earlier for many other families of San Felipe have lived off fishing. Not only does the Vaquita and Tutoba need protection and revitalization, SO DOES San Felipe.

    As Patricia mentioned, conservation groups should also look into the HUMAN factor. I urge conservation groups, all the 50 organizations boycotting to go to these fishing towns. See the poverty it has caused. I’m sorry to say, but if you’re starving and have a family to raise… wouldn’t you do the only thing you know how to do? Work. I am proud that my heritage comes from the northern sea of cortez. I am proud to be from a fisherman family that goes over 100 years. They too have concerns over protecting the Vaquita and Totoaba. WAKE UP CONSERVATIONISTS… Help these poor people survive! Donate better equipment that will save Marine life and Human life. If we are all in this together. ..PROVE IT! Don’t be one sided on this issue. I ask of you to not only save these beautiful animals. Help save the towns in which thier livelihoods will soon be extinct too.

    E. Rubio