Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Mexican government takes control of 2 Mexican banks facing US sanctions

The National Banking and Securities Commission (CNBV) has decreed a “temporary managerial intervention” at the Mexican banks CIBanco and Intercam after both were accused by the U.S. Department of the Treasury of laundering money for Mexican drug cartels.

The CNBV, the Finance Ministry (SHCP), the Bank of Mexico (Banxico) and the Institute for the Protection of Bank Savings (IPAB) said in a joint statement on Thursday that the CNBV governing board decreed the intervention, explaining that it “has the objective of replacing” the two banks’ “administrative bodies and their legal representatives for the purpose of safeguarding the rights of savers and clients of these institutions.”

The decision to intervene was taken in light of “the implications that the measures announced by the United States Department of the Treasury may have on these banks,” the statement said.

The Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued orders on Wednesday that prohibit certain transactions between U.S. banks and CIBanco, Intercam and Vector.

The Mexican financial authorities didn’t say how long the CNBV “intervention” was expected to last.

FinCEN on Wednesday outlined various accusations against CIBanco, Intercam and Mexican brokerage firm Vector, all of which denied the allegations.

US sanctions 3 Mexican financial institutions accused of money laundering

The three financial institutions “have collectively played a longstanding and vital role in laundering millions of dollars on behalf of Mexico-based cartels and facilitating payments for the procurement of precursor chemicals needed to produce fentanyl,” Treasury said.

FinCEN accused Intercam executives of meeting “directly with suspected Jalisco New Generation Cartel members to discuss money laundering schemes” in 2022. At least some of the executives with that bank as well as CIBanco and Vector will presumably lose their jobs due to the intervention decreed by CNBV.

The SHCP said on Wednesday that the CNBV had conducted a review of the three financial institutions and detected “administrative problems,” but no evidence of involvement in money laundering. It also said it asked the Treasury Department to provide proof that links the financial institutions to “illicit activities,” but “no evidence was received.”

In their joint statement, the CNBV, SHCP, Banxico and IPAB said that “financial authorities maintain confidence in the strength and resilience of the Mexican financial system and will continue working in permanent coordination to continue fostering the stability, integrity and correct functioning of the system.”

Mexican Banking Association: Intervention ‘seeks to create an environment of certainty’

The Mexican Banking Association (ABM) responded to the “temporary managerial intervention” announcement in a statement.

“Concerning the announcement made by the regulatory authorities with respect to the intervention of two banking institutions, the ABM expresses that, according to the available information, these particular situations don’t represent a systemic risk nor do they affect the stability of the Mexican financial system, which remains strong and well-capitalized,” the association said.

“The intervention announced seeks to create an environment of certainty that allows the institutions to operate with normality during the time required to ensure that said institutions comply with regulatory standards,” the ABM added.

“This measure provides clarity and stability, without interrupting the regular operation of the banks in question,” it said.

The ABM also said that “the prevention of illicit activities and the protection of legality are strategic priorities for the banks that operate in Mexico.”

“That’s why we have promoted robust mechanisms for regulatory compliance, audit and control,” the banking association said, adding that said mechanisms “operate under the highest international standards of quality.”

With reports from El Financiero and Reforma 

5 COMMENTS

    • yep. And on more move that will make it more difficult as an expat to get access to our funds held in U.S. banks. Not to mention the 3.5% tax that we will all be hit with just to gain access to our retirement income, along with all Mexican people in the U.S. sending remittances here to their families. Disgusting.

      • The remittance tax is on those that ARE NOT USA citizens. So if you are an American citizen and sending your money from your US account to your Mexico account there will be no tax, at least not now. This is a remittance tax. If you think Mexicans have a problem, go watch the Philippines reaction. The Philippines largest portion of GNP is remittance.

  1. Excuse me but this is old news; has been massaged over and over since it happened last week. I would prefer some reasoned thinking as to what our options are, as long-term American residents of Mexico. Thank you!

    • Old news? Did you look at the date the article was written and published? As usual MND is on it and published this the day the news came out

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


building

Manufacturing propels Mexico’s exports to all-time high in September

0
Mexico is on track to set a new record for export revenue in 2025, and to exceed $600 billion in earnings for just the second time ever.
Vegetable prices displayed at a Mexican market

Inflation in Mexico eases to 3.63%, beating analysts’ predictions

0
The slowing of inflation beyond expectations in early October likely gives the Bank of Mexico leeway to cut interest rates for the 11th straight time.
An engineer in a forklift next to a piece of machinery labeled WEG

Brazilian manufacturer, facing 50% US tariffs, looks to invest in Mexico

2
The CFO of the manufacturing firm WEG said his company is working to "reallocate export losses" as U.S. tariffs continue to reshape global commerce.
BETA Version - Powered by Perplexity