New government won’t police migrants on behalf of US: Sánchez

The incoming federal government will not accept funding from the United States to “police” and deport migrants, the prospective interior secretary said.

Asked about a September 12 report in The New York Times, which said that the administration of United States President Donald Trump intends to offer Mexico US $20 million to help pay for plane and bus fares to deport as many as 17,000 Central American migrants before they reach the U.S., Olga Sánchez Cordero said that no such proposal had been made.

“Mexico would never lend itself to being police for the United States?” a reporter asked the former Supreme Court judge.     

“That has not been put on the table in any way,” Sánchez Cordero said.

“And you wouldn’t do it?”

“No, definitely not,” the future interior secretary responded.

However, the current government, which has less than three months left in office, said in a statement issued by the Secretariats of the Interior and Foreign Affairs that it is “continuing to evaluate the proposal” from the Trump administration, which The Times said was outlined in a note sent to the U.S. Congress.

But the statement stressed that “the government of Mexico has not accepted verbally or in written form said proposal, nor has it signed any document in this respect.”

It added that the government will continue to cooperate with the United States on migration, “seeking at all times . . . to promote orderly, legal and safe migration with full respect to human rights and the international legal framework.”

Sánchez Cordero said that president-elect Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s proposal for migration is clear and involves collaborating with Central American countries to stimulate economic and social development.

Under the plan, the necessity for citizens of countries such as Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador to make the often-perilous journey through Mexico to the United States would be reduced.

“What Andrés Manuel wants is for people to emigrate to the United States out of preference not necessity,” Sánchez Cordero said.

In a letter sent to Trump in July, the president-elect proposed that Mexico, the United States and each Central American nation contribute resources according to the size of its economy and that 75% of the collective funds be allocated to finance projects that create jobs and combat poverty, while the other 25% would go to border control and security.

“At the same time, every government, from Panama to the Rio Grande, would work to make the migration of its citizens economically unnecessary and take care of their borders to avoid the illegal transit of merchandise, weapons and drug trafficking which, we believe, would be the most humane and effective way to guarantee peace, tranquility, and security for our peoples and nations,” he wrote.

The revelation that the Trump administration is proposing to pay its southern neighbor to help curtail migration flows contrasts sharply with the U.S. president’s repeated promises that Mexico will pay for his proposed border wall.

Although Mexico detains thousands of migrants every year, Trump has repeatedly portrayed the Mexican government as a poor ally on migration issues.

“Mexico does nothing for us,” he said in May.

“Mexico talks but they do nothing for us, especially at the border. They certainly don’t help us much on trade, but especially at the border they do nothing for us,” Trump declared.

A spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said the government’s funding proposal, which would redirect foreign aid money, was aimed at relieving immigration flows across the Mexico-United States border.

“We are working closely with our Mexican counterparts to confront rising border apprehension numbers — specifically, a 38% increase in families this month alone — directly and to ensure that those with legitimate claims have access to appropriate protections,” Katie Waldman said.

While the relationship between Trump and López Obrador appears to have got off to a good start, getting the latter to agree to the former’s deportation plan would require a significant turnaround.

On the campaign trail leading up to the July 1 election, the then-candidate pledged that Mexico “wouldn’t do the dirty work” of foreign governments, referring specifically to the deportations of Central Americans.

Source: Milenio (sp), Dinero en Imagen (sp), El Universal (sp) 

Have something to say? Paid Subscribers get all access to make & read comments.
NL Gov. S. García

Gov. García, already in ‘party mode,’ offers free beer at Monterrey’s World Cup Fan Fest

0
While other major cities across the nation are banning alcohol at their World Cup Fan Fests, alcoholic drinks will be sold at the Monterrey event, and, according to the governor, beer will be free.
Mexico City Stadium

Mexico City’s box seat owners kept their seats at the World Cup — but they’ll pay dearly to eat in them

0
If they want to eat and drink, box owners will be forced to purchase "hospitality packages" directly from FIFA, which reportedly cost US $75,000 for 12 people for all five World Cup matches at Mexico City Stadium.
estela de luz protest

Activists climb a Mexico City monument to proclaim that human rights are ‘also in play’

1
The choice of the phrase "in play" (en juego) in reference to human rights was seemingly meant to call attention to how little notice they are getting compared to the World Cup games.
BETA Version - Powered by Perplexity