It costs a lot of money to not have a lot of money.
In fact, I’d say one of the ways that the rich stay rich is by charging everyone else as much as they possibly can while paying as little as they can. One way this can happen is through interest on credit, often needed these days even for the bare essentials. It also happens through late fees, payday loans and cash checking centers. In the United States, even the cap on social security taxes allows the rich to simply stop paying it after their income reaches a certain point. Plenty of other US tax policies allow wealth to stay concentrated, too.

Take me. Now, I don’t consider myself poor — not in Mexico, anyway. But around this time last year, I lost my “main” job. Odd jobs — and writing for this publication — kept me afloat somewhat with the essentials that had to be paid in cash. But for everything else, I used my credit cards. Luckily, I have US cards and pretty good credit, so especially compared to Mexico, interest rates I paid and still pay were and are fairly low.
Still, it’s been rough, and I’m in a hole that’s going to take me a while to dig myself out of. My cards are getting dangerously close to being maxed out. And though I make at least the minimum payments faithfully every month and have never missed a payment, my previously “excellent” credit is now simply “average.”
Add to that “processing fees” from services like Paypal and Stripe — employers often determine how one can get paid — and you’ve got a smaller chunk of change already, even before paying self-employment taxes. Nickled and dimed, indeed.
Luckily, I have what I think and hope will be a steady job for the foreseeable future, with better pay that I’m used to. Even so, it’s going to take sucking in my gut for the rest of the year to get out from under this mountain of debt, and a not-insignificant portion of my payments now are simply interest charges.
All this is to say that I know from very personal experience what a difference a five percent tax on remittances, like the kind proposed by the Trump administration in the U.S., could make on working people just trying to send money home. With prices ever-increasing and all our economic futures uncertain, every dollar or peso truly does count.
This is a situation that many people find themselves in all over the world. Salaries and wages have not kept up with inflation or the cost of living on either side of the border. Mexico is at least working on raising the minimum wage. But in the States, there are, sadly, many accounts of people working full-time jobs and living in their cars or in shelters. It’s just really hard to keep up for lots and lots of people.

Many of those hard-working people up north are immigrants. Many keep for themselves the bare minimum for survival, preferring to send the rest to family back home. Relatives back home, meanwhile, count on that money to get by; often, entire families do. And though not all workers have legal status, they do pay US taxes.
The proposed tax on remittances is deeply unfair, but it is also deeply unsurprising. After all, the overall policy of the new presidential administration seems to be a sort of reverse Robin Hood: take from the poor to give to the rich. As they work at figuring out how to pay for a gigantic tax break for the wealthy, they’re cutting off money for everyone else wherever they can. Essential social services are dwindling, even when they weren’t all that strong to begin with. Even people who thought they were safe are feeling this wealth transfer.
Programs that provided not only services but jobs are disappearing, no matter what contracts say. Major services are being decimated, stable jobs replaced with an overworked few, plus AI. My father is terrified he’ll stop getting his social security. Hopefully that won’t happen. But if a problem arises, who will be staffing the offices that might be able to help him?
Cutting services isn’t the only way the Trump administration is looking to pay for this tax cut, though. The world has been watching in horror as he’s levied nonsensical tariffs on allies and enemies alike, ignoring all previous agreements.
There’s a new Baby Godzilla in town, and the tantrum is in full swing.
We know that Trump considers tariffs a “great deal” for the U.S. But even more money is needed to fund that tax cut, and we are definitely not asking Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk to pay it.
So who can we charge beyond all the people we’re already charging? One of the political right’s favorite boogeymen, of course: the immigrant.
Because it’s not enough that they’re already living in even more precarious situations than citizen workers are, especially with ICE now running around like the Gestapo. They need to be punished for having dared to enter the country in the first place. This goes for legal immigrants, too. “Everything you get to do here is a privilege, not a right,” the message seems to be.
In a perfect world, remittances would not be necessary. Everyone would be able to make the amount of money they need for them and their families to survive and thrive wherever they wished to live.
But that is not our world, and many families’ survival depend on that money sent back home. Let’s at least not pile on the cruelty.
Sarah DeVries is a writer and translator based in Xalapa, Veracruz. She can be reached through her website, sarahedevries.substack.com.
The tax rate should be 100% for people residing and working illegally in the United States. Get out.
Jim – the proposed tax on remittances is irregardless of legal status and would be applied to all non-US citizens.
What tax should apply to the serial felon in the White House?
Put him in general pop and let them determine the taxes and fees.
TDS 🤡 8 out 0f 10 in the states disagree with you. Get on board or get left behind.
What a comment!
Are you drinking again? Thought you’d stopped!
Jim, I’ve got to know…who ARE you? Do you live in Mexico as an immigrant? Why do you read this paper? I am genuinely curious.
Why are you even interested in Mexico news daily? Keep your comments on your side of the border and stay ignorant, if you so choose.
Nickled and dimed, indeed. Enough to make a guy barf! 🤮
As for the tax on remittances the raza are adept at circumventing roadblocks! Think ladders for walls. The most obvious work around to this tax is to just have a citizen send their money. Other options like using a third country to route the money are already materializing on the internet….
The other option people might take is to send it via crypto currencies. Like TrumpCoin.
🎯
Brilliant!! 🤣🤣
Well written Sarah Thanks. Hang in there
Bancomer visa credit card. 61% interest
¿Brava, Sarah! How can this tax on remittances be legal? Glad to know your own situation has stabilized. Thanks for having the courage to speak out against the injustice and cruelty of the Trump administration. We all need to stand up, speak out, and resist. Let’s make America America again, a land of fairness and compassion and law.
Nicely said John.
I so agree with you! Excellent and well written article,
Well thanks, y’all. 🙂
TAX THE RICH!
They certainly aren’t paying their way now.
Surely one would have thought that they had run out of ideas of how to be cruel to the marginal income earners, but here comes another one. I’m afraid to think of what comes next.
You’ve got to give them credit for creativity, I guess.
I thought this article was going to be about the remittance tax. What a deceptive waste of time!
Years ago my ex husband said that everyone in the United states that has an income should get a 10% tax off the top. Flat tax. Period. It sure makes sense as you would never see those rich people creating non profit organizations so they can use that non profit for paying for their way. Taxes annually would be easy. No write offs. It would be fair to everyone and would make lots of tax money.
Exactly
Given that the author of this opinion comes right out and indicates they are socialist/communist. Income redistribution is the main tenant of this philosophy. We don’t know how many people who remit are in the US legally but given the major increase in illegals coming into the country during the last 4 years which btw coincides with a drastic increase in remittances. Also given that Mexico can’t or won’t deal with the cartels and the US is having to devote more resources to stopping illegal immigration and deporting the millions already in the country. Therefore a remittance tax is called for at least temporarily until the number of illegals in the country are not swamping the system. Also keep in mind a great many of those especially in the last 4 years were not Mexican.
William, you are correct!
Immigrants already pay an immigrant tax.It is the 7.6% which they pay in plus what their employers pay in social Security taxes, never to see a cent in the future.
As to the comment of Jim above, his is one of the msot disgusting comments i have read in MND in the 4 years i have subscribed. If you are a US citizen, get out. god has a place for you in the lower depths of hell. Jesus said, Love your neighbor as yourself.
Sarah, I love this article. There are some international credit cards on line, recommenced by one of my banks. You are correct, Tariffs which might cost each American family around $4000 are a form of use tax which will make feasible tax cuts to the top 10%.
The felon president is is a shame to what we call the human race. Your words, he is a reverse Robin Hoodd, stealing from the poor to give to the rich. AVARICE IS Disgusting!
Right, they already pay taxes of which, if they’re not working legally, they’ll never see a dime…besides, this isn’t just for “illegal” immigrants, but for any non-US citizen, meaning US citizens CAN send money abroad without a tax? I think this is about getting money to justify an unjustifiable tax break, as well as about instituting immigrant status as officially second-class.
Why are we forced to listen to the author ramble on about her own personal financial difficulties. This has nothing to do with a journalistic explanation (opinion) of the remittance tax. Please stick to the relevant issues. If you need to talk about personal issues, try therapy.
Well said.
Nobody’s forcing you to read Sarah’s article. I for one enjoy her personal style!
Oh my goodness, Richard. I do hope the captor forcing you to read my articles is apprehended by law enforcement soon!
hahahahahahaha!
Exactly, what a poorly written article. I can see why the author has difficulty with employment and finances. Her opinions are not based in reality. Please do better Mexico News Daily, this is not news, it’s highly biased propaganda, and propaganda from either side of the political spectrum sucks!
Richard, you are correct, this is probably why this author is in her situation, she can not stay on point.
Her credit card situation, borrow, borrow. that’s why the US has to raise some taxes. as far as the usual whining about the rich not paying taxes, I think those why rely on tips and social security payments will enjoy their tax relief.
Illegals are working and residing in the US at great cost to US taxpayers. 5% on remittances doesn’t begin to cover the cost. If they don’t like that they are free to go home.
I am at once reminded of my former promise to myself to NEVER NEVER NEVER read the comments section. It’s sickening at least half of the time.
I can’t help myself, plus it’s just a good idea when I’m the one who wrote the article 😂🤣
The tax on remittances has 2 purposes. The most important is cruelty for the sake of cruelty, one of the essential features of fascism. It punishes hard working people who support their families. By making the lives of those receiving less remittances, it encourages immigration to the United States because their lives are harder. The second purpose is to partially fund the tax cut for billionaires who contribute to Trump’s campaign and the grifters in his administration who made money on inside trading on mindless tariff schemes which are partially rescinded to let insiders make a profit.
I pay a 16% tax on everything I buy in Mexico. Why should the US allow non citizens to earn and send money tax free, not stimulate the US economy, but Mexico’s instead, just to have Mexico charge IVA on it instead? Mexico basically is taxing the US source income while the US gets nothing. They should simply lower the IVA by 5%.
But they’re not “tax-free”; they pay taxes on earnings, and if they’re not working legally, never get any of that money back through social security or Medicare like the rest of us do.
Excellent piece. There are always a few ill-informed venomous trolls who like to hit the the comment section with drive-by insults. You respond to them with humor and grace.
Haha thanks, Robert.
MAGAit men are the worst.
“it” spouts nonsensically at a regular pace – if “it” had actually learned something at wharton, “it” would realize this process would be more costly to implement than the revenues it would collect – emotions over intellect – that was that lot relies on