Sunday, October 19, 2025

Suspected gangster linked to missing Ayotzinapa students to stand trial on drug charges

0
Parents of the 43 missing students protested at the Federal Judicial Council.
Parents of the 43 missing students protested at the Federal Judicial Council. They claim corruption among judges is delaying progress in the case.

A suspected gang leader allegedly involved in the abduction and presumed murder of 43 teaching students in Guerrero in 2014 has been ordered to stand trial on organized crime charges not related to the students’ disappearance.

A federal judge on Thursday ruled that José Ángel “El Mochomo” Cassarrubias Salgado, presumed leader of the Guerreros Unidos gang, and his lawyer, Arturo Rodríguez García, must go on trial on drug trafficking charges.

Both men are being held in preventative custody in the Altiplano federal prison in México state.

The federal Attorney General’s Office (FGR) alleges that Rodríguez was also a member of the Guerreros Unidos gang, which is accused of abducting students from the Ayotzinapa Rural Teachers College on September 26, 2014 and killing them.

According to FGR investigations, the lawyer was involved in the transport of drugs, colluded with authorities and acted as a front man for the gang in the purchase and sale of properties.

Cassarrubias has been accused of ordering the murder of the 43 students, who were abducted after being stopped by police in Iguala, Guerrero, in a bus they had commandeered to travel to a protest march in Mexico City.

He was arrested in June after almost six years on the run but released from the Altiplano prison on July 1 due to a lack of evidence. However, he was rearrested upon leaving the correctional facility.

The FGR alleged that El Mochomo’s mother paid multi-million-peso bribes to the presiding judge’s staff to secure her son’s release.

Rodríguez, who represented Cassarrubias at the July 1 hearing at which he was freed, allegedly acted as an intermediary in the arrangement.

Saturday will mark six years since the Ayotzinapa students went missing but the remains of only three of the young men have been found.

According to the  previous federal government’s “historical truth,” the students were intercepted by corrupt municipal police in Iguala and handed over to the Guerreros Unidos, whose members killed them, burned their bodies in a dump and scattered their ashes in a nearby river. The students were allegedly mistaken as members of a rival gang, Los Rojos.

Casarrubias, right, and his attorney have both been ordered to stand trial.
Casarrubias, right, and his attorney have both been ordered to stand trial.

The current government rejected its predecessor’s official version of events and launched a new investigation shortly after President López Obrador took office in late 2018.

While the government claims to have made progress, what really happened to the students remains unclear and no alleged perpetrators of the crimes have been convicted.

There are, however, a number of suspects in prison awaiting trial.

El Mochomo’s brother, Sidronio Cassarubias Salgado, is in custody as are former Iguala mayor José Luis Abarca, his wife María de los Ángeles Pineda Villa, former Iguala security director Felipe Flores Vázquez and former municipal police chief Francisco Salgado Valladares.

Sidronio Cassarubias was allegedly the top leader of Guerreros Unidos while the former mayor and his wife – once known as the Imperial Couple of Iguala – have been accused of being the masterminds of the students’ abduction.

It is unclear when the suspects in the case of the students’ abduction and presumed murder, including El Mochomo, will be brought before a court on those charges.

Many other suspects, including former police officers and alleged Guerreros Unidos members, have been released from prison due to a lack of evidence or because they were found to have been tortured during the interrogation process.

Alejandro Encinas, deputy interior minister for human rights, said a year ago that the release of 21 municipal police officers detained in connection with the disappearance of 43 students was a sign of the “wretchedness and rot” of Mexico’s justice system.

At the end of June, Attorney General Alejandro Gertz Manero said that authorities were seeking to arrest 46 municipal officials in Guerrero for the crimes of forced disappearance and organized crime in relation to the kidnapping of the students. It’s unclear how many of those officials have been detained.

Meanwhile, parents of the students continue to seek the truth about what happened to their sons and where their remains are today.

The parents and other relatives of the victims will march on Saturday from the Angel of Independence in Mexico City to the capital’s central square, the zócalo, where a rally will be held to call for justice.

On Thursday they protested outside the headquarters of the Federal Judicial Council, where they accused judges of acts of corruption in the case. Although the federal government has shown a willingness to get to the bottom of the mystery, a lawyer for the parents said, the Federal Judiciary has not been moving in the same direction.

Source: El Universal (sp), Milenio (sp) 

Unhappy Interjet customers prepare to sue over ongoing cancellations

0
interjet

Disgruntled Interjet customers are preparing a class action suit against the Mexican low-cost airline over the constant cancellation of flights and its reimbursement practices.

The unhappy would-be passengers are also preparing a collective complaint to be filed with the federal consumer protection agency Profeco.

Pablo Martínez Castro, the moderator of a Facebook group called Queja Colectiva a Interjet (Collective Complaint Against Interjet), said that about 3,500 people have signed on to support the legal action.

He said that talks are underway with a law firm interested in representing the dissatisfied customers and that other people who have had bad experiences with Interjet will have the opportunity to join the lawsuit.

In addition to regularly canceling flights, Martínez said, the airline is guilty of two practices that have caused customers to lose significant amounts of money.

He said that when a flight is canceled, Interjet issues customers with vouchers for amounts less than they paid for their tickets. As a result they are forced to pay extra when rebooking a flight on the same route.

Martínez also said that Interjet is duping people by advertising extremely low-cost flights that never get off the ground.

Customers in possession of vouchers from previously-canceled flights use them to buy tickets for the cheap flights, he explained. But when they are canceled, Interjet issues them with a new voucher for the value of the cheap flight, compounding customers’ losses, Martínez said.

Customers have been complaining about the airline’s flight cancellations and reimbursement practices for months, and more than 900 filed a collective complaint with Profeco last month.

Interjet officials have said that the coronavirus pandemic has required the company to modify its operations and make short-term adjustments to meet changing demand.

But they appear to have fallen foul of the law in the process.

According to Mexican civil aviation law, in the event of a flight cancellation affected customers are supposed to be guaranteed another flight to their destination or must be compensated for the full value of the unused flight — minus any flight legs already taken — plus 20% of the ticket’s value.

Interjet, which has financial difficulties, is not the only Mexican airline against which complaints have been filed but it has upset more people than any other, according to Carlos Rebolledo Sánchez, a Profeco director in San Luis Potosí.

He said that customers should check with airlines to ensure that all the flights listed on their websites are in fact scheduled to go ahead.

“A lot of the time airlines announce their flights on their websites and even though they can be booked sometimes they’re not scheduled and are canceled. … They end up giving [customers] electronic vouchers that must be used in less than a year. … That has caused a lot of complaints,” Rebolledo said.

The bad news for Interjet doesn’t end with the looming legal action and its financial difficulties – the Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA) has suspended its license to operate in Canada for failing to have liability insurance coverage.

The CTA issued an order on September 11 stating that Interjet was not in compliance with section 60 of the Canada Transportation Act. It said that Interjet’s license would be reinstated once it complies with the insurance requirements.

The airline has previously operated flights between Mexico City and Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.

Interjet lost 90% of its fleet after 25 leased aircraft were repossessed by creditors in recent months. It is not currently flying any international routes.

Source: Milenio (sp), El Sol de San Luis (sp) 

AMLO demands ‘blind obedience;’ ex-Indep chief reveals reasons for leaving

0
jaime cardenas
Cárdenas: 'I expressed doubts and I believe they didn't always like those doubts.'

The departing chief of the federal agency tasked with distributing funds obtained through the sale of assets seized from organized crime claims that President López Obrador and other high-ranking members of the government expected “blind obedience” of him.

Jaime Cárdenas of the Institute to Return Stolen Goods to the People (Indep) submitted a resignation letter to the president this week in which he claimed that the agency is plagued by corruption and that officials stole jewelry in its possession.

In an interview on Wednesday, Cárdenas said his resignation was related to disagreements he had with López Obrador and his inner circle.

The outgoing Indep director said that they asked him to dismiss employees, cancel contracts and make resources available to other government departments without following proper procedures.

“They believed that I was going to have total and blind obedience to what they told me,” Cárdenas said, adding that he was prepared to follow orders but disagreed with the way officials wanted things to be done.

López Obrador, left, and Cárdenas
López Obrador, left, and Cárdenas: he lacked courage to combat corruption, the president said Thursday of the former Indep director.

He said that as a result of his training as a lawyer he insisted on doing things the right way and respecting procedures. His views, Cárdenas added, drove some members of the government to despair because they saw them as obstacles to getting things done.

Despite clashing with López Obrador and members of his team, Cárdenas said that he was – and continues to be – loyal to them.

“But my loyalty wasn’t blind, my loyalty is thoughtful, I believe that’s where the problems started,” he said.

“I expressed doubts and points of views both to the close collaborators of the president as well as the president himself and I believe that they didn’t always like those doubts and remarks,” Cárdenas said, conceding that he lost López Obrador’s support.

The president, he added, believes that politics is about results and that how they are achieved is of lesser importance.

“The president questioned my training as a lawyer several times, … my insistence on procedures,” Cárdenas said after acknowledging that his departure was inevitable.

He said that he still considers López Obrador a “good president” and that he hasn’t become disillusioned with the federal government’s project to transform Mexico.

Earlier on Wednesday, the president charged that Cárdenas quit his post out of fear and a lack of desire to combat corruption within Indep.

The fight against corruption is like the fight between David and Goliath and Cárdenas wasn’t up to it, López Obrador said.

“He didn’t enter [the fight]. … To be a [public] servant in a process of transformation you need desire, conviction and courage, and not give up.”

Source: El Universal (sp), Reforma (sp) 

Judge says consultation over prosecuting ex-presidents is unconstitutional

0
A vote could also violate the past presidents' right to the presumption of innocence, Justice Aguilar said.
A vote could also violate the past presidents' right to the presumption of innocence, Justice Aguilar said.

President López Obrador’s plan to ask citizens whether Mexico’s five most recent former presidents should face justice for crimes they may have committed while in office is unconstitutional, according to a Supreme Court judge.

López Obrador sent a request to the Senate last week to approve a national consultation that would ask citizens whether Carlos Salinas, Ernesto Zedillo, Vicente Fox, Felipe Calderón and Enrique Peña Nieto should be investigated and put before a court if there is sufficient evidence to do so.

In a submission published Thursday and to be discussed in the Supreme Court on October 1, Justice Luis María Aguilar argues that such a consultation is unconstitutional because it would subject the past presidents’ human rights to the will of the people.

He wrote that a consultation cannot ask citizens either expressly or implicitly about issues that “involve the restriction of human rights recognized in the constitution and in international treaties to which Mexico is party.”

A prohibition on such consultations is necessary because it ensures that Mexicans’ rights are protected, Aguilar said.

Holding a consultation in which citizens are asked whether the appropriate authorities should investigate, prosecute and punish past presidents for crimes they might have committed implies subjugating their human rights to the people when the government should be complying with its obligation to protect those rights, the justice wrote.

Aguilar also argued that a consultation could violate the past presidents’ right to the presumption of innocence.

In addition, he said that if a consultation found that a majority of citizens don’t want the ex-presidents to face justice, a miscarriage of justice could ensue if they had in fact committed crimes while in office.

Such a situation would constitute a betrayal of the constitution and the Mexican people, Aguilar said.

Responding to the justice’s views, López Obrador charged that Aguilar was making arguments already expressed by Calderón, who said last week that if the president has “well-founded proof” that he committed a crime in office he should present it to the Attorney General’s Office rather than hold a consultation.

The president also called on Supreme Court justices to act in accordance with the law and not allow themselves to be intimidated.

In addition, they should “take the sentiment of the people into account,” he said.

“They don’t need to read me article 35 of the Constitution, which establishes that human rights mustn’t be violated. I believe that there is no violation of rights and guarantees … because in the event prosecution takes place, the appropriate authority will have to [act] within the prevailing legal framework,” López Obrador said.

The president has previously indicated that he wouldn’t vote in favor of prosecuting his predecessors because he favors looking to the future rather than dwelling on the past.

Government critics argue that the plan to hold a consultation over prosecuting past presidents is, like the “presidential plane” raffle, a ploy to distract attention from more serious issues such as the coronavirus pandemic and the ailing economy.

Source: El Financiero (sp) 

Anti-AMLO protest moves into zócalo ‘to fight 20th-century socialism’

0
Tents of anti-AMLO protesters have sprouted in the zócalo.
Tents of anti-AMLO protesters have sprouted in the zócalo.

Arturo Martínez bustles between tents erected on the main square outside Mexico’s National Palace, issuing instructions with a megaphone, as riot police look on from the other side of a metal barricade.

After four days camped out on the tarmac of a major avenue nearby, prevented from advancing by police, protesters have finally made it to the emblematic central square, the zócalo, to demand the resignation of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, widely known as AMLO.

“We’re sleeping here, we won’t abandon the tents. We are fighting against 21st-century socialism,” says Martínez, a lawyer. “They can’t evict us.”

About half of the square — which is flanked by the imposing National Palace, the cathedral, the Mexico City government headquarters and the Supreme Court — has been penned off for the coloured tents, some displaying Mexican flags on which the eagle and snake emblem has been replaced by the words “National Anti-Amlo front”, or Frenaaa.

The biggest anti-government protests in López Obrador’s almost two years in office mark growing dissatisfaction with the populist president. Support for López Obrador, which started at a heady 80%, has been eroded by his poor handling of the pandemic, a deepening recession and stubbornly high homicide rates.

He has faced multiple protests, including one by women who took over the National Human Rights Commission for two weeks this month demanding action on gender violence and disappearances, and by farmers in northern Mexico who clashed with police over water resources at a vital dam.

Although his approval ratings remain solid at around 53%, López Obrador has polarized many Mexicans. He advocates tolerance but displays what critics say is a fierce authoritarian streak, and almost every day attacks opponents as “conservatives” whom he says are resisting his drive to purge corruption and transform the country.

López Obrador was swept to office by a grass roots movement after years of campaigning, including a months-long sit-in on Mexico City’s central Reforma Avenue in 2006 after what he claimed were stolen elections.

Now, with protesters camping out on the streets, the people are using López Obrador’s tactics against him.

The Frenaaa protest (a play on the word “stop”), led by retired businessman Gilberto Lozano, claims to have no political aspirations beyond ejecting the president from office as soon as possible.

“He’s going to resign . . . the pressure is just going to escalate,” said Lozano, speaking from a hotel near the makeshift campsite set up last Saturday after riot police blocked demonstrators from taking over the symbolic zócalo.

The president is going to resign, predicts Frenaaa leader Gilberto Lozano.
The president is going to resign, predicts Frenaaa leader Gilberto Lozano.

They only gained access on Wednesday after winning an injunction.

But taking to the streets against López Obrador is a move that may backfire.

“The streets are his base,” said Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera at George Mason University in Arlington, Virginia. “Despite serious criticism and a more articulated opposition, I still see huge support for AMLO’s government … even though results leave a lot to be desired.”

Lozano, a one-time manager at Mexican Coca-Cola bottler and the conglomerate Femsa, is undeterred. What began earlier this year with protests by caravans of cars in more than 200 cities has grown into a nationwide movement, he says, with more protests planned.

“We represent the people who work and pay taxes and create wealth,” he said. Most protesters were middle class, and many retirees.

The president mocked the leaders, urging them to sleep in the tents rather than hotels. In one video shared on social media, a woman with a megaphone was heard appealing for volunteers to stay in the tents.

Lozano, who says he has received death threats and moved indoors for security reasons, said some 700 people a night have been sleeping under canvas despite heavy rain. However, many tents appeared empty.

More demonstrators would be arriving in the coming days to relieve the first groups and “maintain a nearly permanent force,” Lozano said.

Alfonso Ramírez Cuéllar, the head of López Obrador’s Morena party, called Frenaaa a “fascist group that wants to break the political stability we enjoy in Mexico today.”

But López Obrador invited demonstrators to stay, saying he defended freedom of expression.

However, by initially keeping them away from the zócalo, he dictated terms and “won the opening match,” said one government insider, who saw no prospect of social protests translating into electoral risk for the president.

“Those of us who voted for him voted for change and that’s happening — but you have to be patient,” said César Rodríguez, a carpenter.

López Obrador says his opponents can get rid of him by voting him out of office in a referendum scheduled for early 2022 — a reform he introduced that he says ensures a more democratic government. He would even like to bring that vote forward to next June to coincide with midterm elections.

“I don’t think the protest will get rid of him, but people are fed up,” said Mario Acuña, a shopkeeper, who now regrets voting for López Obrador and said he would join the protest if he could.

“Nothing will halt us,” said Lozano. “Together, we are a tsunami.”

© 2020 The Financial Times Ltd. All rights reserved. Please do not copy and paste FT articles and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Anti-AMLO protest camp moves into Mexico City zócalo

0
The Frenaa protest camp Wednesday in the zócalo.
The Frenaa protest camp Wednesday in the zócalo.

Protesters demanding the resignation of President López Obrador have converged on the zócalo, Mexico City’s central square, after having camped for five days on Avenida Juárez in the capital city’s historic center. 

Protesters affiliated with the National Anti-AMLO Front, or Frenaaa, moved to the square Wednesday after they obtained an injunction permitting them to do so.

According to Gilberto Lozano, leader of the organization, protesters will camp out in the square until at least November 30, and if President López Obrador does not resign the protest could be extended. 

Reinforcements from Tamaulipas, Aguascalientes, Querétaro, Nuevo León and Chiapas are expected to arrive soon to rotate out current protesters now that Frenaaa has achieved its goal of taking the central square, Lozano said.

Yesterday afternoon, a group of López Obrador supporters arrived and confronted the protesters without violence, while police stood in the middle of the two groups.

Some 350 protesters in brightly colored tents woke up in the zócalo this morning under the watchful eye of at least 300 police officers, and with a metal barrier preventing their access to the remainder of the square and the National Palace.

A food stand was set up where breakfast consisted of eggs, salsa, beans, bread and coffee.

A sound system was also put in place, and the group sang the national anthem at 7:30 and complained about not being able to bring a banner featuring the Virgin of Guadalupe or metal objects into their encampment.  

President López Obrador said members of the movement are welcome to the zócalo and that their rights, medical attention and care are guaranteed as they camp in the square.

The president recalled that he has also participated in protests in the past, at times sleeping overnight. This morning, López Obrador asked his supporters not to engage with protesters, while challenging Frenaaa leaders to set up tents in the square and sleep alongside their followers, “day and night, rain, thunder or lightning.” 

Source: El Universal (sp)

Deputy health minister warns of Covid flare-up in flu season

0
López-Gatell
López-Gatell: 'Providing care will be a significant and difficult challenge.'

Although new coronavirus cases have numbered in the thousands per day for months, Mexico’s coronavirus czar has warned that a new wave of infections could begin in the middle of October, coinciding with the beginning of the flu season.

In an interview with Milenio Television, Deputy Health Minister Hugo López-Gatell said that new coronavirus case numbers have declined in recent weeks but that a new outbreak, “as is happening in European countries,” is likely to commence in the middle of next month.

Case numbers and hospitalizations of coronavirus patients would peak in November or December in such a scenario, he said.

With regard to influenza, López-Gatell said that nobody knows exactly when the new season will start but added that there is no doubt that Mexico will have one. He predicted that flu cases will be seen in the first half of October and that the peak of the outbreak will be in November, December or January.

With both the coronavirus and the seasonal flu set to coexist, hospitals across the country will come under great pressure, the deputy minister said.

“I want to … make it clear that … we’re going to have full hospitals again; to be able to provide care [to everyone] will be a significant and difficult challenge,” López-Gatell said.

However, he expressed confidence that the health system will be up to the task, asserting that hospitals have made the necessary preparations.

The deputy minister acknowledged that the coronavirus pandemic in Mexico has been long – the first cases were detected here at the end of February – because of the mitigation measures put in place to slow the virus’s spread.

The main objective of the coronavirus restrictions – including the suspension of all nonessential activities between late March and the end of May – was to reduce the number of new cases recorded on a daily basis, López-Gatell said.

He asserted that new case numbers have been on the wane for eight weeks, although the last time that fewer than 2,000 new cases were reported on a single day was May 13.

An “orderly easing of lockdown measures” is crucial in order to continue to reduce the number of new coronavirus infections, the deputy minister said.

Coronavirus cases and deaths in Mexico reported by day.
Coronavirus cases and deaths in Mexico reported by day. milenio

Although the federal government has been criticized for not advocating more forcefully for face masks, López-Gatell asserted that it does recommend their use. However, he stressed that a face mask doesn’t provide complete protection against the coronavirus, pointing out that a person can be infected through the eyes.

Addressing the possibility that a person could have Covid-19 and influenza at the same time, López-Gatell said that the chances were “extremely low.”

Vaccines against the latter arrived in Mexico six weeks ago, he said, rejecting claims that the government was still awaiting delivery.

López-Gatell announced Monday that the Health Ministry had purchased 35 million doses and that flu vaccinations for the general public would begin October 1.

Meanwhile, Mexico’s accumulated tally of confirmed coronavirus cases increased to 710,049 on Wednesday with 4,786 new cases reported. The Covid-19 death toll rose to 74,949 with 601 additional fatalities.

Although case numbers and deaths continue to rise, it may not be long before the coronavirus stoplight risk map could see some states’ risk levels drop to green, or low risk.

López-Gatell said on Wednesday that 16 states could go green “soon.” There were hints last week that Campeche and Chiapas could be the first to reach the low-risk level.

Source: Milenio (sp) 

Senate approves new law prohibiting corporal punishment against children

0
Senator Vázquez
Senator Vázquez: corporal punishment widely used.

Lawmakers have unanimously passed a modification to the General Law on the Rights of Children and Adolescents to prohibit corporal punishment and humiliation of children.

“It is forbidden for the mother, father or any person in the family to use corporal punishment or any type of humiliating treatment and punishment as a form of correction or discipline of children or adolescents,” reads the bill which received preliminary approval from the Senate last November.

National Action Party Senator Josefina Vázquez Mota noted that the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) has indicated that in Mexico corporal and humiliating punishment as a form of violence against children is prevalent.

“More than 60% of girls, boys and adolescents between 1 and 14 years old are subjected to psychological aggression and corporal punishment in their homes,” said Vázquez, who heads up the Commission on Children and Adolescents, citing UNICEF figures.

A survey in August by the Guardianes Foundation, an advocacy group, revealed that during the coronavirus quarantine, 40% percent of children and adolescents suffered psychological and physical violence.

Under the new terms of the law, corporal punishment is now defined as “any act committed against girls, boys and adolescents in which physical force is used, including blows with the hand or with any object, pushing, pinching, biting, pulling hair or ears, forcing them to maintain uncomfortable postures, burns, ingestion of boiling food or other products or any other act that has the object of causing pain or discomfort, even if it is slight.”

Humiliating punishment encompasses offensive, degrading, devaluing, stigmatizing, ridiculing and disparaging treatment.

In addition, the law establishes that all members of the family, especially girls, boys and adolescents, have the right to have other members respect their physical, mental and emotional integrity in order to contribute to their healthy development.

However, the reform does not stipulate any punishment for adults who inflict physical abuse on minors.

During discussion of the reforms to the existing law, Senator Xóchitl Gálvez recounted her own experience as the daughter of a physically abusive father. Gálvez fought back tears as she spoke of the terror she felt while she and her siblings were being beaten by her alcoholic father, and said she hoped the reform to the law would end the kind of violence she experienced. Gálvez also noted the violence that exists in indigenous communities, where she said parents “take out their frustration” on their children.

Mexico is now the 11th country in Latin America with specific legislation prohibiting corporal punishment against children, joining Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela.

The first country to ban corporal punishment was Sweden in 1979. 

Source: Reforma (sp)

Social and environmental tensions rise in the Yucatán peninsula

0
maya train
The treaty provides new tools to resist megaprojects such as the Maya Train on environmental grounds.photo illustration

Shortly after he was sworn in as president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador promised the indigenous communities of Mexico — who have historically had their voices silenced and their needs marginalized — that they would have priority in the development of new social programs.

In the south of the country at least, the promise proved to be short-lived with the announcement of projects such as the Maya Train and aggressive expansion of renewable energy and pig farming industries creating divisions and tensions in the very communities they purport to benefit.

Running 1,500 kilometers through southeastern Mexico, the Maya Train has birthed deep controversy, particularly because it plays into the same recurring narrative of externally imposed decisions which has affected indigenous communities for the last 500 years. Multiply this by the Mexican government seemingly unwilling to acknowledge the adverse ecological and environmental — and now archaeological — impacts it will have in the region, and the beginnings of a perfect storm are taking shape in the country’s south.

Which is not to say that the Maya Train is a one-off, rather an extension of a neoliberal modus operandi which — whatever your politics — transparently and singularly fails to take into account genuine local opinion, storing serious, systemic problems for the future of all involved projects and “megaprojects,” as well as for the society they are to exist within.

Beyond the rails being laid, prior even to the completion of environmental impact surveys, the Yucatán peninsula has also become a new focal point of large scale meat production, with industry growth seeing 3.5% more meat produced nationally in July 2020 compared to July 2019, despite public health consequences.

A Maya Train consultation meeting held last December.
A Maya Train consultation meeting held last December.

While there is a chance that ongoing restrictions as a result of Covid-19 may impose some regulations on the expansion of the livestock industry in Mexico, a great deal of the damage has already been done to communities in the tropical south, whose lands and livelihoods have already been affected by mass swill lagoons and depletion and pollution of groundwater sources which serve local communities.

It is little wonder, therefore, that community groups across the south are becoming increasingly vocal in their opposition to the continued bulldozing of their lands to make way for immense and disruptive infrastructure development. What before was whispered discontent is now turning into peninsula-wide calls for retribution, and even — on occasion — militancy.

The president’s standard response to resistance to his proposed projects is that there is a hidden political motivation to the criticisms of indigenous communities, with other parties implied to be fomenting and funding opposition.

Just last week he accused environmental groups of working on behalf of paid organizations, both within the country and abroad, to oppose the Maya Train. It is a defence uttered because he knows his supporters will find traction in his words, and while undoubtedly there are pockets of funded rebellion in areas where dominion was historically set to a particular party, the essential truth on the ground is a far cry from López Obrador’s paranoid accusations.

Pedro Uc Be, for instance, of the Múuch Xíinbal Assembly of Defenders of the Maya Territory, talks of how the organization is necessarily apolitical, not because they do not hold political positions, but because they and their ancestors recognized that there was no fundamental difference between one party and another in Mexico’s flawed democracy.

“We want to take care of what little we have left; we have had 500 years of aggression, of invasion, of colonization and these years have actually left us with a complicated, difficult situation.” Their backs are to the wall, and Pedro Uc Be understands — just as the UN does these days — that land and environmental custodianship and indigenous rights are not separate entities, but a necessarily intersected fabric which offers the only way forward for oppressed communities and overt, systemic environmental degradation.

Maya Train consultations were 'propagandist' meetings, according to Pedro Uc Be.
Maya Train consultations were ‘propagandist’ meetings, according to Pedro Uc Be.

Recognizing the need to appear to have consulted locally vis a vis the contentious train, the López Obrador administration organized meetings with individuals with vested interests through several regional assemblies. These took place, however, before the environmental impact assessment of the project had even been commissioned, with scant mention of how the project would involve not simply a train but also the construction of development hubs at each of the stations.

Meetings also took place in areas unrelated to the train, participation in person was insisted on even though local and federal governments had established lockdowns, information provided was coercive rather than consultory, and many resistance groups were denied access to meetings for reasons related to “lost or incorrectly filed paperwork.”

“In reality these aren’t consultations at all,” says Pedro Uc Be, “but propagandist meetings held with individuals standing to economically profit from the development, and not communities as a whole. People aren’t in favor of the train, but there certainly are people who are misinformed, who have been manipulated, people who actually don’t understand nor have been properly informed of the fundamentals of this project. If they had been real consultations, women would have been invited to participate, and they weren’t. What is a community meeting without the voice of the mothers and grandmothers of the region?”

His tone as is calm, concerted, and focused, but there are plenty of others whose anger feels as though it is riding a thin edge. Within the communities of La Ermita and Camino Real in Campeche, bisected by the rails of the train, significant sections of the community are to be forcibly relocated and hearing despairing voices is the norm.

“There are people here with papers signed by Porfirio Díaz, thanking their great grandparents for allowing the old train to pass through here,” says Lourdes Ganzo. “Four hundred and thirty families are to be evicted, and these historic, traditional neighborhoods were here before the old railway lines were built. Even then there was never a legal right established to give the railway right of passage.

“Nobody has ever tried to destroy our houses until this government, without even asking for our papers demonstrating our legal rights. We have been threatened — our own president has been declaring that it is going to happen, nothing is going to stand in its path. We are being sentenced to being socially and culturally overrun by a high-speed train.”

Farmer Dzonot Carretero listens to information about windfarms on his lands.
Farmer Dzonot Carretero listens to information about windfarms on his lands.

In a record year in Latin America for killings of indigenous land protectors, Pedro Uc Be’s opposition to unsustainable tourism, renewable energy projects, and the Maya Train has brought its own personal backlash.

He and his family have received threats from organized crime units, at best wanting to silence him, at worst …  We know how the story ends. And while López Obrador is busy criminalizing the work of civic groups and non-profits working to protect the land, the insidious possibility that the government has mobilized organized groups to threaten Mayan communities — who are standing up against the violation of their social and land rights — poses a real and immediate threat to the lives of individuals.

It is deplorable, laments Pedro Uc Be, that a president who took up the mantle of leadership with such legitimacy is today using that same legitimacy to crush what little Mayan communities have left, privileging instead the interests of the large organizations, like Fonatur, a government agency.

“The president continues to lie and falsify information, at the expense of indigenous cultures. We’re tired, exhausted even, but we’re not giving in. We are all that we have left.”

Man, 30, files complaint after Mom kicks him out of the house

0
Christian Uriel did nothing but play video games
Christian Uriel did nothing but play video games, his mother said. illustrative photo

A 30-year-old man filed an assault complaint with the Mexico City Attorney General’s Office against his mother and aunt after they kicked him out of the house.

Christian Uriel told authorities that he was “offended” because his mother ran him out of her home for being a deadbeat.

Uriel’s mother described her son as a nini, meaning that he doesn’t go to school or work (ni trabaja ni estudia), and she became fed up with his behavior. She says he spent the entire coronavirus quarantine on a couch playing video games and demanded that she bring him whatever he desired. 

Once lockdown conditions were lifted she said she asked him to get a job to help out with expenses, but he refused. His mother enlisted the help of the boy’s aunt, and together they poured cold water on him and struck him with brooms until he finally left the house, located in the Polvorilla neighborhood of Iztapalapa.

Uriel told authorities he would like to return home and asked for their help.

A survey last year of 3,000 Mexican millennials — people aged 25 to 35 — by De las Heras Demotecnia found 63% still lived with their parents and six out of 10 said they were in no hurry to begin a life like the one their parents led. 

Source: El Universal (sp)