Did the government cover up February’s Gulf of Mexico oil spill?

More than a dozen environmental organizations this week accused the government of covering up an oil spill that has despoiled some 630 kilometers of beaches along the Gulf coast.

Satellite imagery shared by Greenpeace and other nonprofits suggests the origin of the catastrophe dates to early February, but government officials didn’t acknowledge the problem until nearly a month later when complaints about oil slicks in the water and tar on Veracruz and Tabasco beaches became public.

President Sheinbaum displayed a Greenpeace communication at her Thursday morning press conference in order to dismiss it as alarmist and unscientific in its use of data and imagery. (Galo Cañas/Cuartoscuro.com)

President Claudia Sheinbaum on Thursday minimized the breadth of the damage. She also criticized Greenpeace for a widely circulated infographic depicting the spill as “a fake” and “unscientific,” saying it had needlessly alarmed the public — though Greenpeace had already acknowledged the image in question was not its own nor satellite-based, and was simply illustrative.

The state-owned oil company Pemex had earlier denied responsibility for the spill itself and Veracruz Governor Rocio Nahle — a former energy secretary with close ties to Pemex — blamed a privately owned vessel operating off the coast of Campeche, though an inspection revealed the ship in question was not responsible.

On Wednesday, NGOs led by Greenpeace and the Mexican Center for Environmental Law (Cemda) pointed a finger at the government, insisting that satellite images reveal early knowledge of the spill, insufficient containment and a lack of transparency.

That satellite imagery shows the spill originated near Pemex’s Abkatún platform as early as Feb. 6. Multiple vessels engaged in containment efforts were visible by Feb. 13 — evidence that authorities were already aware of the spill, the NGOs said.

In a press release, Cemda accused the government of mismanaging the disaster, saying “[t]here was no timely public information on the magnitude of the spill, its risks or the response measures.” 

Although the National Contingency Plan “provides for immediate notification, incident assessment and inter-institutional coordination,” none of that took place, Cemda said.

By Feb. 14, “the oil slick covered approximately 50 km², or more than 1,000 times the size of Mexico City’s Zócalo,” Cemda says, adding that the failure to issue a public alert as required by law prevented coastal communities from taking preventive measures.

As of Wednesday, neither the Environment Ministry nor the Agency for Safety, Energy and Environment had published the Net Environmental Benefit Analysis or the Sensitivity Maps required to coordinate the official response.

However, nearly seven weeks after the initial spill, the oil slick has spread along 680 kilometers of the coastline with tar coming ashore on various beaches in Veracruz and Tabasco. The oil has also affected the Veracruz Coral Reef System, as well as six other natural protected areas.

With reports from La Jornada, Diario de Xalapa, Proceso and Reforma

2 COMMENTS

Have something to say? Paid Subscribers get all access to make & read comments.
earthqauke drill

An earthquake drill is set for Wednesday May 6. Here’s what to expect

0
The recurring drills, usually focused on states most likely to suffer damage in the event of a quake, are becoming part of the culture, and preparedness- conscious officials are fine with that.
Cancún's new bridge

President Sheinbaum and Gov. Lezama inaugurate Cancún’s new Nichupté bridge

0
The famed Caribbean coast resort's long-awaited Puente Nichupté connecting the city to the hotel zone is open for use, saving commuters as much as an hour.

Mexico City is sinking faster than ever, new NASA data reveals

0
After centuries of draining the lake water around it and overexploiting its remaining aquifer, Mexico City is sinking from its own weight, with little underneath to hold it up.
BETA Version - Powered by Perplexity