On Thursday, Citi said in a statement that “after careful consideration of the proposal, including but not limited to financial considerations and transaction certainty, we have advised Grupo México that Citi rejects the offer.”
“We firmly believe that the transaction we announced on September 24, 2025 and the planned IPO will allow us to complete the divestiture of Banamex in a responsible manner and maximize value for our shareholders,” said Citi, a New York-based multinational investment bank that purchased Banamex for $12.5 billion in 2001.
On Sept. 24, Citi announced that “a company wholly-owned” by Mexican businessman Fernando Chico Pardo “and members of his immediate family” had agreed to purchase a 25% stake in Banamex for around $2.3 billion.
The U.S. bank announced last December that it had completed the separation of retail bank Banamex from its institutional banking business in Mexico as it prepared to list Banamex on the stock exchange.
On Monday, Citi said that it remained “committed to realizing the full value of Banamex for our shareholders, and the agreement we announced with Fernando Chico Pardo and the proposed IPO continues to be our preferred path to delivering that outcome.”
It said at the time that it hadn’t received Grupo México’s offer, but committed to review it in a “responsible manner.”
Ernesto Torres Cantú, director of Citi International, Mexican businessman Fernando Chico Pardo and Manuel Romo, CEO of Grupo Financiero Banamex. (Galo Cañas/Cuartoscuro)
Citi’s IPO, or initial public offering, of Banamex shares will occur on the Mexican Stock Exchange, probably sometime in 2026.
Reuters reported that shares in Grupo México climbed more than 4.5% on Thursday after Citi announced that it had rejected the conglomerate’s offer for Banamex.
The news agency reported that news of Grupo México’s $9.3 billion bid for the bank had “rocked local markets, wiping off billions in the firm’s market capitalization.”
Grupo México considered buying Banamex more than two years ago
Grupo México’s surprise bid last week to purchase Banamex came more than two years after it backed away from previous negotiations to buy the bank.
In February 2023, Reuters reported that the conglomerate had secured US $5 billion to buy Banamex. However, Citi said in May of that year that it would seek to sell Citibanamex on the stock market, ending conjecture that a sale to Grupo México was imminent.
Citi CEO Jane Fraser said at the time that the bank concluded that “the optimal path to maximizing the value of Banamex for our shareholders and advancing our goal to simplify our firm” was to “focus solely on an IPO of the business.”
There are fewer apprehensions "in an entire day now than in just two hours under the last administration," the government departments said. (Manuel Sánchez/Cuartoscuro)
The number of migrants detained by U.S. authorities after crossing the Mexico-U.S. border between official ports of entry declined to the lowest level in 55 years in Fiscal Year 2025, the U.S. government said Tuesday.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced “preliminary enforcement numbers” on Tuesday that showed that there were 237,565 apprehensions at the Mexico-U.S. border in Fiscal Year 2025, which began on Oct. 1, 2024, and concluded on Sept. 30, 2025.
The number was “the lowest fiscal year total in 55 years, compared to 201,780 in Fiscal Year 1970,” DHS and CBP said in a statement.
They also said that the figure was 87% below the average of the last four fiscal years, which was 1.86 million.
CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott said that the data for Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) “shows what happens when we enforce the law without compromise.”
“For too long, agents and officers were handcuffed by failed policies. Today they are empowered to do their jobs – and the result is the lowest apprehensions in more than five decades, and the most secure border in modern history,” he said.
DHS and CBP said that the reduction of border apprehensions to a 55-year low “is a testament to the Trump Administration’s success in restoring control at the border despite the handicap of more than three months of Biden’s open-border chaos at the start of the fiscal year.”
More than 70% of apprehensions in FY25 occurred in the final months of the Biden administration
DHS and CBP said that 72% of the apprehensions of migrants in FY25 occurred during the Biden administration.
Joe Biden was in office for the first 111 days of FY25, a period in which 172,026 migrants were detained at the border, according to the preliminary U.S. data.
During the first 254 days of the Trump administration — a period accounting for the remainder of FY25 — 65,539 migrants were detained after illegally crossing the Mexico-U.S. border. That figure represents 27.6% of the total apprehensions in FY25.
The preliminary data indicates that during the second Trump administration, an average of around 8,000 migrants per month have been apprehended after illegally crossing the Mexico-U.S. border.
CBS News, which obtained the preliminary DHS data before it was released, reported that as many as 9,000 migrants were detained at the border on some single days during the Biden administration.
In Fiscal Year 2022, U.S. Border Patrol detained a record high 2.2 million migrants at the Mexico-U.S. border, a figure more than 800% higher than that recorded in FY25.
Migrants can be counted more than once if they are detained again by U.S. authorities after having previously been turned back to Mexico.
Why have border apprehensions dropped so dramatically?
CBS News reported that soon after U.S. President Donald Trump began his second term, “his administration moved to seal and militarize the southern border, closing down the American asylum system using emergency powers, dispatching thousands of soldiers to repel illegal crossings and shutting down Biden-era programs that allowed some migrants to enter the U.S. legally.”
Migrants have thus been dissuaded from attempting to enter the United States since Trump began his second term on Jan. 20.
Trump said at the time that the Mexican “soldiers” would be “specifically designated to stop the flow of fentanyl, and illegal migrants into our Country.”
Migrant apprehensions in September 95% lower than Biden-era average
DHS and CBP said that an average of 279 migrants were apprehended per day in September.
There are fewer apprehensions “in an entire day now than in just two hours under the last administration,” the government departments said.
DHS and CBP also said that apprehensions in September were 95% lower than the Biden administration’s daily average of 5,110 from February 2021 through December 2024.
However, apprehensions in September — which numbered almost 8,400 — increased around 80% from the monthly low of 4,600 in July.
DHS and CBP also highlighted that “September marked the fifth consecutive month with ZERO releases [of migrants] by the Border Patrol along the southwest border, compared to 9,144 releases in September 2024.”
White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson said that “President Trump has overwhelmingly delivered on his promise to secure our Southern Border.”
“As a result, Americans are safer — unvetted criminal illegal aliens and dangerous drugs are no longer pouring over our border unchecked,” she said in a statement.
The White House said in a separate statement that “after Biden-era chaos unleashed a record-shattering invasion, the seismic turnaround proves that strong leadership can, in fact, stop the flood of illegal crossings, deadly cartels, and security threats dead in their tracks.”
Salesforce has operated in Mexico since 2006, with a client list that includes Xcaret, Grupo Bafar and FEMSA. (Shutterstock)
Salesforce, a cloud-based software that helps companies manage their customer relationships (CRM), announced it would invest US $1 billion in Mexico over the next five years, aimed at expanding its operations, fostering digital transformation and accelerating the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the country.
“This investment will not only create jobs and develop AI skills in Mexico, but will also position our country as a key consulting hub for markets throughout Latin America in the field of AI agents and much more,” Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said after announcing the news on Wednesday.
The investment will fund the opening of a new five-story office building in Mexico City and the creation of a Global Delivery Center (GDC), which will offer specialized AI consulting services to clients throughout Latin America. This involves hiring specialized talent to strengthen Salesforce’s presence in the country and providing multilingual support in Spanish, English and Portuguese.
“This $1-billion investment is a commitment to Mexico as a key market for AI-powered growth,” Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said.
The company noted that it also plans to solidify its vision of the Agentic Enterprise, which combines human employees and AI agents to enhance customer service and other client-facing projects. Reuters reported Salesforce recently rolled out Agentforce, its AI agent platform designed to automate tasks, streamline operations and help lift margins.
“Salesforce’s commitment to expand its investment in Mexico underscores the strength of our economy and the exceptional talent we have,” Ebrard added.
According to the company, some of the funds will be allocated to training and development programs, including US $250,000 to the Friends of Philanthropy organization, which will train 100,000 Mexican students in AI.
Salesforce has operated in Mexico since 2006, with a client list that includes Xcaret, Grupo Bafar and FEMSA.
The removal of the fence on sacred Wixárika land sets a potentially valuable precedent in Mexican law for Indigenous rights activists, as it's the first time Article 59 of the Agrarian Law was used to reclaim communal ejido lands. (Photos by Tracy L. Barnett)
Thick clouds covered the unusually lush, green lands of San Luis Potosí as campesinos and their Wixárika guardians gathered at the edge of the barbed wire. Back home in their adobe kitchens, women prepared huge skillets of scrambled eggs, steaming pots of beans and warm, fresh tortillas. Those savory flavors of the Wirikuta region would be loaded onto the back of a pickup truck and carried down rocky roadsto feed about 200 who had come from near and far to stand in solidarity and witness history.
For three years, members of the Ejido Las Margaritas — located in the sacred desert known as Wirikuta — had resisted efforts to parcel and privatize their communal lands, known in Mexico as ejidos. In 2023, the government of former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador issued a decree that recognized and gave federal protection to all the sacred places and sites of the Wixárika, Náayeri, Odam or Audam and Mexikan peoples.
A delegation of Wixárika authorities from San Sebastián Teponahuaxtlán and Tuxpan de Bolaños, two sister communities in the Western Sierra Madre community of northern Jalisco.
Recently, on Sept. 26, members of Ejido Las Margaritas took a decisive step: dismantling an illegally erected fence that threatened to fragment not only their territory but also a protected natural area and the Wixarika pilgrimage route through the desert, recognized just weeks ago by UNESCO as part of humanity’s world heritage. The fence had been put up by a group of ejido members who sought to subdivide and privatize part of the communal lands — a move others feared could open the door to agribusiness or mining interests rapidly expanding across the region.
With federal agrarian officials and human rights observers standing by, the men began loosening posts, rolling up the metal strands and carrying them off in measured bundles. But what unfolded that day was more than the removal of barbed wire. For the first time in Mexico, Article 59 of the Agrarian Law was invoked to defend ejido lands as a forest ecosystem, thanks to a scientific study recognizing desert plants like peyote, mezquites, nopales and creosote bush — known locally as gobernadora — as protected forest cover.
This unprecedented legal articulation — combining agrarian law, environmental law and Indigenous rights — set a national precedent.
As Jonathan Noyola, head of Mexico’s Agrarian Attorney’s Office, put it, “It is not an act of confrontation. It is the restoration of legality.”
The symbolism was potent.
“Taking down the fence is taking down the barbs that divide us,” said Marina Meza of Sincronía Wirikuta, a collective of activists from around the country working in defense of the sacred site. “So the deer can run, the rabbit can leap, the rattlesnake can pass — and so we can all walk in balance and peace.”
Locals young and old participated in removing posts and carefully dismantling the barbed wire fencing, which was turned over to local municipal officials.
The act of de-fencing
The people began to gather just after sunrise, in the golden light of the high desert, at the Casa Ejidal, a complex of adobe buildings in the center of the ejido. Coffee, pan dulce, gloves and wire cutters were shared, and gradually people gathered around the kiva-style amphitheater at the center.
Daniel Giménez Cacho, the award-winning Mexican actor who has advocated for the defense of Wirikuta for more than a decade, opened the circle, invoking God, the Sun and Kayumarie, the blue deer deity that guides the steps of the pilgrims who come to these lands in search of spiritual guidance. His presence underscored the gravity of what was to come. The round of introductions made clear the breadth of the gathering, which included:
Wixárika delegations from at least three communities in the high Sierra of Jalisco and Durango, for whom these desert plains are a sacred pilgrimage destination far from home.
Members of far-flung ejidos, some of whom had traveled for hours and slept on the bus to stand in solidarity, each with their own territorial struggles to share.
Land defenders from a collective called Guardians of the Sierra.
Officials from Mexico’s Agrarian Attorney’s Office — led by Noyola and accompanied by Dra. Beatriz Vera Castillo, who oversees the agency’s nationwide network of regional offices.
Representatives from the Interior Ministry (SEGOB), the National Institute of Indigenous Peoples (INPI), the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), and the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH).
Delegates from the San Luis Potosí state government, the government of Catorce, a municipality that encompasses Las Magaritas and other ejidos in the area, and a pair of deputies from Mexico’s National Congress who had come to observe the proceedings.
Mauricio Guzmán, an environmental anthropologist from the Colegio de San Luis who brought his students, offering them a living lesson in Mexican democracy.
A team of diversely skilled organizers, documentarians and other professionals from Sincronía Wirikuta.
Then came the logistics. Tunuari Chávez, legal advisor for the ejidatarios (communal land owners) and Sincronía Wirikuta, laid out the action plan: The 5-kilometer fence, once dismantled, would be turned over to the municipal government. Roughly 60 ejidatarios and supporters would do the physical labor, while others would provide backup and document the process.
There was always the possibility of provocateurs showing up at the behest of those who had erected the barrier, but the plan was clear: De-escalate conflict and keep working. Such provocation had been made much less likely by the arrival of 11 Mexican National Guard units — about 66 soldiers in all — sent by the federal government to keep the peace.
By the time the convoy of pickup trucks rolled out toward the disputed fields, the strategy was in place. A line of campesinos moved steadily along the wire, some prying posts from the rocky soil, others coiling the four rows of barbed strands, one by one, into neat bundles. It was the kind of work they had done all their lives — but this time, they weren’t just clearing land. They were reclaiming it.
By lunchtime, the wire and posts lay in orderly piles. Observers had seen no conflict. The work was carried out with discipline and restraint. As Chávez summed it up later: “We didn’t just take down a fence. We took down the walls between us.”
The legal breakthrough
The events in Las Margaritas represented far more than a local dispute resolved in the field. They signaled a new phase in Mexico’s approach to agrarian justice — one in which institutions, campesinos, and Indigenous peoples work side by side to restore legality to communal lands that have long been under pressure from privatization.
“Taking down the fence is taking down the barbs that divide us,” says Marina Meza of Sincronía Wirikuta, a collective of activists defending the sacred site.
“Most social movements,” Noyola explained, “are movements of resistance — they resist the economic forces that seek to take their land, their water, their environment. But here, the resistance itself went on the offensive. The Ejido Committee of Las Margaritas, supported by Wixárika communities, campesinos from other regions and environmental movements — and under the protection and accompaniment of the federal authorities — carried out an act of territorial reclamation. That happens very rarely, if ever.”
Beatriz Vera Castillo, who coordinates the agency’s national network of regional offices, described the action as a reaffirmation of Mexico’s communal property system.
“The ejidos and communal lands are the heart of the country,” she said. “More than half of Mexico’s territory is in their hands — that’s where our forests, biodiversity, and culture live. Preserving social property isn’t just important for those who live here, but for all Mexicans.”
For Chávez, who helped shape the legal strategy, the meaning was simpler.
“When the law and the heart walk on the same side, things change,” he said.
UNESCO, Indigenous rights, and an environmental siege
The victory at Las Margaritas resonated far beyond the ejido’s dusty boundaries. Just three months earlier, as UNESCO recognized the Wixárika pilgrimage route through Wirikuta as part of humanity’s world heritage — a symbolic safeguard for one of the most sacred and biodiverse deserts on Earth — threats were multiplying: industrial greenhouses, mining concessions, water extraction and fenced-off lands that cut through ceremonial and ecological corridors.
On the day after the de-fencing action, as volunteers washed the last dishes and cleared away the clutter, a rainbow appeared over the Sierra de Catorce, which many participants interpreted as a blessing for a job well done.
Guzmán said the struggle encapsulates a national dilemma between modernization and people’s right to exist.
“We could say that this case brings hope that the rights of both campesino and Indigenous communities will be respected and protected,” he said. “We’re not in an Indigenous community here, but the implications are broader — because modernization and development projects aren’t going to stop in this country. Quite the opposite: What we’re seeing are highways, railroads, all kinds of projects aimed at deeper territorial integration, and that will have an impact.
“The question is how to do this — what guarantees will there be? How can communities, even the smallest ranch or village, feel included in the decisions that affect them? Because that’s what’s at stake. I don’t think progress has to mean sacrificing these communities in the name of development.”
Giménez Cacho framed the day’s events as a glimpse of a different kind of civic and moral order — one in which public servants and citizens work together toward justice.
“I grew up in a culture where public officials were your adversaries,” he reflected. “… So today, to see public servants come here to uphold the law — it moved me deeply. A journalist asked me about utopias, and I told them, ‘In Mexico, for the law to be fulfilled — that’s the utopia.’”
The road ahead
A truckload of farmers from ejidos throughout the region came to stand in solidarity and lend a hand. Here, they had just finished with their assigned section of the first fence and were making their way to the second one.
By the closing circle on Sunday, tension had given way to quiet celebration. A core of allies and friends had stayed at the home of Eduardo “Lalo” Guzmán, ejidal treasurer, subsistence farmer and desert defender for decades, even though Guzmán was on a lecture tour in Europe, sharing the struggle of Wirikuta with more potential allies. Children played, women warmed the menudo and, finally, the group gathered as they had begun — around the fire in front of Lalo’s house.
All spoke with eloquence and passion, but Ricardo Peralta, the environmental educator and training coordinator who had been running the mobile kitchen with military precision, gave voice to the hopes of many.
“What we’ve witnessed these days — this synergy of people — is a clear message for all of Mexico. It’s proof of the beautiful things that can be achieved,” he said.
“For every Margaritas, may there be 10, 100, 1,000 more. May each one of them have that same strength, that same energy, that same love for the land — for life, for the people, for the animals, for the hills,” he added.
“What you achieved is historic,” Peralta said. “No one had ever managed to bring so many different actors together in one place — and you, the people of Margaritas, did it. Few have accomplished so much.”
Tracy L. Barnett is a freelance writer based in Guadalajara. She is the founder of The Esperanza Project, a bilingual magazine covering social change movements in the Americas.
A Mexico airport construction project took an unexpected turn when workers discovered a treasure trove of ice age fossils. (INAH)
The construction crews were in a hurry. López Obrador had just canceled the half-built Texcoco airport and entrusted the military to build what would become Felipe Ángeles International Airport (AIFA). However, there was one problem: Everywhere the crews dug, they turned up huge quantities of bones. Government archaeologists would have to be called in, slowing down an urgent infrastructure project. Little did they know, they had uncovered one of the richest Ice Age fossil sites in the world, an ancient treasure trove that would allow Mexican scientists to make remarkable discoveries about the country’s prehistoric past.
It started with a team of six archaeologists, but grew to more than 50 Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH) specialists overseeing a construction project that had turned into a massive archaeological dig. They eventually found over 70,000 fossils from ancient mammoths, camels, horses, giant ground sloths, dire wolves, deer and other ancient megafauna — including bits of at least 500 Columbian mammoths.
The mammoth discovery that was made in Mexico
Mexican scientists have sifted through more than 70,000 fossils from the Felipe Ángeles International Airport Discovery. (INAH)
When most people think of mammoths, they imagine a woolly mammoth. Furry and relatively compact, woolly mammoths were well-adapted to living in the icy northern reaches of the Americas. Columbian mammoths, on the other hand, could reach four meters (13 feet) at the shoulder and weighed up to 12 tons. They were the descendants of the first mammoths to reach the Americas over a million years ago, long before their woolly cousins arrived.
Occasional fossil finds confirmed that Columbian mammoths roamed as far south as modern-day Costa Rica. But since ancient DNA tends to degrade in warm climates, most of what is known about them comes from northern populations. Before the discovery of the AIFA fossils, the genetics and evolution of these tropical mammoths were largely a mystery.
Access to the newly uncovered mammoth fossils was the opportunity of a lifetime for Mexican scientists, and they didn’t let it go to waste. A team of researchers from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) began working to extract ancient DNA from the fossilized mammoth teeth found at AIFA and several more found nearby in Tultepec.
The difficulties of doing DNA analysis on fossils found in the tropics
Very little ancient DNA has been found in the tropics, and none has ever been recovered from tropical mammoths. The delicate strands of genetic material fall apart quickly in warm, moist settings. But the UNAM scientists had a couple of advantages on their side. The Basin of Mexico fossil sites were both over 2,000 meters above sea level, providing a cooler, drier climate than elsewhere in the tropics. Another plus: After being dug up and exposed to air, fossils naturally begin to degrade. But in this case, the scientists were able to access the fossils quickly while they were still relatively fresh.
Paleogeneticist Federico Sánchez, one of the researchers at UNAM, said the team confirmed that the fossilized teeth found at the sites belonged to Colombian mammoths based on their shape. After that, he told Mexico News Daily, the scientists began drilling out dental dust samples for DNA analysis. The first surprise was the amount of genetic material they found. Tens of thousands of years after the mammoths died, over 80% of the teeth still tested positive for DNA.
They worried the dental dust might have been contaminated. DNA fragments could have come from bacteria on a researcher’s hands or even a breath of air that touched the sample, so they compared it with known mammoth genetic material. Once again, the tests were positive. When Sánchez saw the results, he knew they had something very special on their hands.
A tagged fossil containing genetic material from the airport excavation site. (INAH)
How new information was unearthed about the Ice Age past of the Americas
“It took my breath away for a moment, because I hadn’t been sure that we were going to obtain endogenous mammoth DNA, and much less from so many individuals,” he said. “It was a very special moment.”
As they analyzed the DNA, the researchers found something unexpected. The Basin of Mexico mammoths were very different than their northern brethren. In fact, the northern Columbian mammoths appeared to be more closely related to woolly mammoths than to mammoths of their own species found in the Basin of Mexico. A likely explanation, Sánchez said, is that northern Columbian mammoths interbred with woolly mammoths. Colombian mammoths arrived in the Americas over 100,000 years before woolly mammoths, so some may have moved south before having a chance to get it on with their woolly northern cousins.
The scientists also found a high degree of genetic diversity within the Basin of Mexico mammoths, possible evidence of earlier hybridization between woolly mammoths, Columbian mammoths, and, even farther in the past, the ancient steppe mammoths of Eurasia.
New insights into the social lives of ancient mammoths
The analyses even provided hints about what the mammoths’ social lives might have looked like. In other areas, there are more male mammoth fossils than females, possibly due to males leaving behind matriarchal social groups to wander off on their own, then dying in natural traps like swamps or tar pits — typical behavior for elephants and related species. In Mexico, however, the genetic sex of the fossils showed an equal split between male and female. That suggests that the social groups stayed together, so males and females faced the same risk of dying and becoming fossils.
The results, now published in the prestigious scientific journal Science, are groundbreaking in more ways than one. It’s one of the first times scientists anywhere have extracted DNA from large animal fossils in the tropics, and the first genetic analysis of tropical mammoths. In total, the team found more Columbian mammoth DNA than every other previous study combined, a resource that scientists around the world can now use for their own studies.
It’s a relatively new field of study for Mexican scientists, who have long excelled in archeology but have less of a track record in ancient DNA studies … until now.
Mexican scientists were among the first to source genetic material from megafauna found in the tropics. (INAH)
Mexico’s first major megafauna genetics project
“It’s the first genetic study of megafauna in the country,” said María del Carmen Ávila, another UNAM senior researcher who worked on the study. “Having developed the technical capacity, human resources and infrastructure to do it here allows us to know more about our natural history.”
Another remarkable achievement was that much of the project was carried out by two ambitious undergraduate students. Ángeles Tavares Guzmán, who was studying biotech engineering, did most of the hands-on experimental work to extract the DNA. Eduardo Arrieta Donado, a genetics science student at the time the project started, did nearly all the evolutionary DNA analyses, Sánchez said. Together, Tavares and Arrieta are the lead authors on the article published in Science.
There’s still much to learn about the history of Columbian mammoths and the natural history of Mexico in general. However, thanks to this team of Mexican researchers, the country now has more tools than ever to tackle the problem.
Sánchez and other UNAM scientists are currently working to extract and analyze DNA from fossilized horses, camels, bison and deer uncovered during the construction of AIFA airport.
Studying the fossils of AIFA “has been a very thrilling and enriching experience from the start,” he said, “and we’re very excited for what’s coming next.”
Rose Egelhoff is a senior editor for Mexico News Daily.
Homicides have sharply declined during Sheinbaum's presidency, but the percentage of people who feel unsafe in the city in which they live has risen. (Daniel Augusto/Cuartoscuro)
Citizens’ perceptions of insecurity and the United States’ allegations that Mexico is not fully complying with the USMCA free trade pact were among the issues President Claudia Sheinbaum spoke about at her Wednesday morning press conference.
Here is a recap of the president’s Oct. 8 mañanera.
Sheinbaum holds up a stop clock that she uses to keep track of the time during her morning press conferences. (Daniel Augusto/Cuartoscuro)
Homicides are down, but public fear of insecurity is up. Why?
Sheinbaum said that perceptions of insecurity “have to do with many aspects, many issues” beyond homicide numbers, which declined almost 25% annually in the first nine months of 2025. The ENSU considers things like whether people feel unsafe at the bank, on the streets they regularly use and on the highway, places where robberies are commonly committed.
Attempts at extortion over the phone “don’t necessarily” result in “fraud” or people paying money to extortioners, but do generate fear among the population, Sheinbaum said.
She said that another factor that causes people’s perception of insecurity to increase is that “a lot of media outlets” exaggerate “issues of violence,” which generates “an environment” in which people think “there is a lot of insecurity in the country.”
Therefore, the increase in the number of people who consider their city unsafe “also has to do with the kind of communication” employed by “traditional media outlets,” and by “some [television] channels in particular,” Sheinbaum said.
“… Now we [also] have social media and the fake news that is created on social media. So obviously we have to inform from here,” she said, referring to her mañanera lectern.
Sheinbaum: The new judiciary will aid the quest for peace
Sheinbaum said that her government will continue to work “every day” to improve public security in Mexico.
“Regardless of the [anti-government] campaigns, regardless of what appears on social media, we’ll work and listen to the people to continue providing peace and security,” she said.
“And I’m sure that the new judiciary will help us a lot,” Sheinbaum said.
The newly reformed Supreme Court offers additional protections for the current government, while limiting opportunities for opposition candidates to win seats. (Supreme Court)
Sheinbaum argued that the elections were needed to renew the judiciary and thus rid it of corruption and other ills.
Mexico’s USMCA compliance ‘problems’
A week after United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer accused Mexico of failing to comply with the USMCA free trade pact, Sheinbaum said there are “about 50 points raised by the United States regarding what they consider to be ‘Mexico’s problems’ with the trade agreement.”
She said that her government is “clarifying” the situation regarding the alleged compliance problems because reality doesn’t “necessarily” match “the view they have.”
“I’ll give you an example,” Sheinbaum continued.
“In the case of labor, they say that there aren’t enough resources for [Mexico’s] labor courts. They were only counting the budget that the federal government provides, but each state of the republic provides a budget to its own courts. If you put it all together, it’s more than 4 billion pesos [US $218.2 million],” she said.
“So issues like those are simply clarified and resolved,” Sheinbaum said.
She said that her government doesn’t agree with some of the United States’ other USMCA complaints, but is reviewing them nonetheless.
“At least from our point of view, the majority have already been resolved,” Sheinbaum said.
She noted that the “formal review” of the USMCA — scheduled for 2026 — hasn’t commenced, but acknowledged that Mexico and the United States have started public consultation processes.
Sheinbaum also noted that the United States has imposed tariffs on some imports from Mexico, such as vehicles and steel, but stressed that “the majority” of the USMCA is being respected by the U.S. government.
She expressed confidence that the outcome of the USMCA review will be positive for Mexico, even though U.S. President Donald Trump has indicated that he wants to renegotiate the pact that superseded NAFTA in 2020.
“We believe that we’ll do well. We’re optimistic,” Sheinbaum said.
By Mexico News Daily chief staff writer Peter Davies (peter.davies@mexiconewsdaily.com)
The soldiers involved in the incident on the Ciudad Mante-Tampico highway were relieved of their duties and presented to FGR offices in Tampico. (José Batanzos Zárate/Cuartoscuro)
Mexican soldiers opened fire on a vehicle in the northern border state of Tamaulipas on Monday night, killing six people and wounding two others.
The Ministry of National Defense (Defensa) announced the incident on Tuesday, saying in a statement that military personnel were traveling in three vehicles on the Ciudad Mante-Tampico highway when a white truck “attempted to ram” one of the army vehicles.
“Upon perceiving a risk to their physical safety and after some maneuvers, … [the soldiers] made use of their weapons and unfortunately five people lost their lives and three others were injured,” Defensa said.
The Defense Ministry said that the injured were given first aid and “expeditiously evacuated” to a hospital in Tampico, a city in southern Tamaulipas.
“During the transfer to the hospital, one of the wounded persons died,” Defensa said.
The Defense Ministry said that the Federal Attorney General’s Office (FGR) was “immediately” notified of the incident and began an investigation.
It said that military prosecutors also opened an investigation into the killing of the six people. The soldiers involved in the incident on the Ciudad Mante-Tampico highway were relieved of their duties and presented to FGR offices in Tampico, Defensa said.
The ministry didn’t say whether the victims were armed. Their identities have not been publicly disclosed.
At her Wednesday morning press conference, President Claudia Sheinbaum said that the actions of the soldiers involved in the “very regrettable” incident will be “completely” reviewed.
Asked whether the army still has instructions to not attack “the civilian population” and whether an army commander had made “a mistake” in ordering troops to open fire, Sheinbaum responded:
“We need to review what happened first, in order to have all the information about what occurred. … The use of a firearm has to be rational; there is a law that establishes under what conditions.”
Sheinbaum subsequently asserted that her government isn’t carrying out a “war” against drug cartels like that waged by the administration of former president Felipe Calderón.
During Calderón’s 2006-12 government, “the order was to shoot” at suspected criminals, she said, adding that federal security forces now only respond with force if there is an attack against them first.
Last month, the United States Ambassador to Mexico, Ronald Johnson, asserted that the Sheinbaum administration has made a “bold change” in security strategy in Mexico by ramping up operations against drug cartels. The president disagreed with his view.
An army ‘mistake’?
The newspaper El País reported on Wednesday that it was told by “official sources” that the army killed the six civilians in Tamaulipas “by mistake.”
El País noted that local media outlets have reported that the victims were jornaleros —day laborers who commonly work on farms.
El País reported that, as was the case in Tamaulipas on Monday, “the army didn’t point to any attack against it” before soldiers opened fire. (Facebook)
The newspaper said that military investigations in cases involving the army often become “the basis” of FGR investigations, allowing military prosecutors to “frame the event according to their vision.”
The Centro Prodh human rights organization said on social media on Tuesday that it was concerning that “parallel investigations in the military jurisdiction” continued to be opened in “cases of probable serious violations of human rights.”
Centro Prodh also said that the killing of the six people in Tamaulipas was an “undeniable consequence of the deepening of military power” in Mexico.
Sheinbaum-era precedents
In May, two girls were killed by soldiers in Badiraguato, Sinaloa.
“Family members of Alexa and Leidy, girls aged seven and 11, … reported that both were murdered by army officers in a direct attack on the vehicle in which they were traveling with their family,” the news outlet Animal Político reported.
El País reported that, as was the case in Tamaulipas on Monday, “the army didn’t point to any attack against it” before soldiers opened fire.
On Oct. 1, 2024 — the day Sheinbaum was sworn in as president — soldiers killed six migrants in Chiapas. According to the Defense Ministry, the soldiers opened fire on vehicles that attempted to evade military personnel carrying out patrols on a highway north of the city of Tapachula.
Ten other migrants were injured in the incident. Defensa indicated that soldiers mistook the migrants for criminals.
Two days after the incident, Sheinbaum said that “a situation like this can’t be repeated.”
Carlos Olson San Vicente, a member of the Chihuahua State Congress from the National Action Party, authored and promoted the new law, which he says will eliminate from the schools "ideological language that indoctrinates our children and hinders learning.” (Carlos Olson/X)
The northern border state of Chihuahua has become the first state in Mexico to ban the use of inclusive language in public schools, passing a legislative reform that has ignited debate nationally over language and identity.
Pushed and promoted mainly by members of the Partido Acción Nacional (PAN), the reform was approved 17-14 by the Chihuahua State Congress on Tuesday.
Chihuahua State Congressmember Jael Argüelles criticized the law as regressive, noting, “Language is a living, evolving and ambiguous system that changes daily to name new realities, new identities and ways of existing.” (Jael Argüelles/X)
In amending Article 8 of the state’s education law, the legislation will prohibit inclusive language and promote the correct use of Spanish grammar and spelling rules in classrooms.
“We did it! No more ideologized language in the classrooms or woke confusions,” Carlos Olson San Vicente, a member of the Chihuahua State Congress, wrote on social media after the vote. “Only the biological truth that only boys and girls exist, not ‘niñes.’ Common sense over ideology!”
Olson is a deputy from PAN who authored and promoted the amendment. He is also a member of the state’s legislative committee for Education, Culture, Physical Education and Sports.
The reform makes Chihuahua — nicknamed “El Estado Grande” for its status as Mexico’s largest state by area — the first Mexican state to ban inclusive language in schools.
In other words, there will be no more classroom usage of gender-neutral terms such as “amigue,” “amigx” or “amix” in place of amigo or amiga; “todxs” “todes” or “tod@s” rather than todos or todas; “elle” instead of él or ella.
The common idea in those often awkward coinages is to provide options for avoiding gender-specific terms (usually male) in gender-neutral contexts.
For example, a Spanish noun ending in -os is generally masculine plural, as in todos (all men). But traditional standard Spanish also uses the masculine todos as a plural for a mixed group of men and women, which in recent years has rubbed many the wrong way. Hence the invention of “todxs” “todes” or “tod@s.”
On the legislative floor, Olson argued, “Let the new generations not lose command of their native language, nor should the teaching of Spanish be diluted by the influence of digital trends or linguistic formations that are foreign to the norm of the language.”
Opponents, including Jael Argüelles, a member of the Chihuahua State Congress representing the Morena party, criticized the law as regressive.
“Language fulfills a very specific function: to communicate,” she said. “Language is a living, evolving and ambiguous system that changes daily to name new realities, new identities and ways of existing.”
She said the reform makes invisible the struggles of women, children, Indigenous peoples and the LGBTTTIQ+ community “by imposing rigid criteria on language use.”
The vote occurred only months after the nation’s Senate approved a constitutional reform incorporating gender-inclusive language in national law.
Olson said the reform in his state follows similar decisions in countries such as France, Argentina and just days earlier in El Salvador. He asserted that “schools should teach grammar rules, not ideological language that indoctrinates our children and hinders learning.”
However, according to critics, the approved initiative does not clearly explain what constitutes inclusive language, or how its use distorts language and/or hinders learning.
Currently, there are no mainstream media reports of other Mexican states moving toward a similar legislative ban, though groups and authorities in other states have debated the use of inclusive language.
Since its creation in 1841, the amparo trial has been the balancing factor between citizens and the government. Here's what you need to know about amparo law in its current version. (Tingey Injury Law Firm/Unsplash)
After graduating from law school in Mexico – and before turning to writing full-time – I practiced amparo law for three years. Before that, I interned at a corporate law firm but left it because the job felt detached from what I thought the practice of law should be: creating legal arguments to seek justice for individuals before a court of law.
And there was no greater legal mechanism for defending individuals from abuses of power than an amparo trial.
In Mexican law, an amparo is a course of legal action that defends citizens who have had their rights infringed upon by the government. For instance, if a bright billboard has been installed in front of your house and it creates visual pollution, you could file an amparo trial against the authorities that approved its installation. If the municipality unjustifiably closes your coffee shop, you could claim legal protection against that decision through an amparo trial.
Since its creation in 1841, the amparo trial has been the balancing factor between citizens and the government. Its function within the legal system has helped reduce the asymmetry of power between the people and the state by submitting the authority’s actions to the scrutiny of a qualified judge.
Since I haven’t practiced amparo for a few years, I spoke with former colleagues to hear what they have to say about it.
Magistrate Julia María del Carmen García González, who recently retired after serving for 15 years as a federal judge in an administrative court in Naucalpan de Juárez, qualified the new terms of the reform as a “clear setback” and a “pro-authority reform.”
“I practiced my career through the most protective era of human rights, and now I’m worried, frustrated and sad for what lies ahead,” she said.
Magistrate Julia María del Carmen García González. In Mexico, a magistrate is a federal judge and is considered qualified to serve on the Supreme Court if they so choose. (Facebook)
Attorney at law and professor of amparo and constitutional procedural law at the Universidad Panamericana Guadalajara, Pablo Flores Guerrero, expressed concern that the new reform “sends a dangerous message to the new judges in the judicial system, treating the amparo figure as if it were an abusive tool that, with each favorable ruling, challenges the principles of good governance.”
Here are the most worrying proposed modifications.
The new law changes the definition of ‘legitimate interest,’ restricting access to amparo
Under the terms of the law approved by the Senate, access to amparo is restricted by changes in the definition of interés legítimo (legitimate interest), which “makes rigid a figure that should be dynamic,” Flores said.
To explain this, we need to take a quick look at how amparo works now.
According to the current amparo law, there are two channels through which a person can file an amparo lawsuit: through interés jurídico (legal interest) or interés legítimo (legitimate interest).
“Legal interest” means individuals can only go to court if a personal right is directly violated. For instance, if the government took away their property or fined them unfairly.
Meanwhile, “legitimate interest” (introduced in 2011) allows any person or group of people to go to court, even if the violation doesn’t affect them personally. For example, an environmental organization could file an amparo lawsuit against a project harming a protected natural area, even if the group doesn’t own the impacted plot of land.
See the article below to read more about a case of ‘legitimate interest’ amparo:
However, the new proposed definition (which can be found on page 9 here) can be interpreted to mean that general concern or indirect damage to the population are no longer sufficient cause to file an amparo lawsuit.
“For many years, until the 2011 reform, only people with a legal interest were able to access amparo. But with the introduction of the legitimate interest [amparo], civil society organizations had the opportunity to seek protection,” Magistrate Del Carmen said. “Restricting it is a clear step backwards.”
Flores added that if interés legítimo is dismantled by the proposed changes, lawsuits seeking the protection of community rights (known as “collective amparos”) will also be negatively impacted. In addition, he said, “There is a highly probable risk that the admissibility of amparo claims will become even more problematic.”
The new law limits the application of a provisional suspension
One of the key benefits of an amparo trial is that it halts the allegedly abusive act of the government while the case is being resolved as a way to protect the complainant. This measure is known as “provisional suspension.”Let’s say the municipality closed down your coffee shop. While the case is being studied (which could take months or years), a provisional suspension would allow you to keep your coffee shop open in the meantime.
However, the proposed changes introduce new grounds to restrict its application in some cases. In other words, it expands the scenarios in which a provisional suspension will not proceed.
“The fact that you do not have access to provisional suspensions in these scenarios will allow the authority to continue acting in total detriment of your rights,” Magistrate Del Carmen said.
She said the following changes are the ones that cause the most concern:
In cases of arrest warrants
The new amparo reform does not allow provisional suspension in cases of pretrial detention, meaning that individuals will remain detained at the discretion of the amparo judge without a real possibility of regaining their freedom before being found innocent or guilty.
In cases of blocked bank accounts
The proposed terms eliminate the provisional suspension in cases of bank accounts that have been blocked by the Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF), which typically happens due to suspicions of money laundering.
However, if an account is frozen by mistake (for instance, due to a name mix-up) the affected person could be left without access to their money for months, or even years, while the legal process unfolds.
Retroactive application of the law
The amparo reform approved by the Senate included a controversial clause that allows its provisions to be applied retroactively, affecting cases already initiated under the current law.
This retroactive application has been widely criticized as it violates the Mexican Constitution, which prohibits the retroactive application of laws to the detriment of any person.
Magistrate Del Carmen said that if the reform were approved in these terms, it would violate the principle of legal certainty. This principle is paramount in any legal system, as it allows all individuals to know what they should expect from the law.
Upon learning of this clause, Sheinbaum rejected its inclusion and clarified that her original initiative did not include such a provision, calling on the Chamber of Deputies to eliminate it.
Construction on the Maya Train was suspended on several occasions due to amparos submitted by complainants who asserted legitimate interest regarding the human right to a healthy environment and the right of Indigenous peoples to give their prior and informed consent, among other constitutional rights. (Cuartoscuro)
Are there any positive changes in the proposed reform?
Some experts have pointed out the benefit of introducing online trials in the proposed reform of Mexico’s amparo law. However, Magistrate Del Carmen considers this change to be irrelevant in the face of the other modifications.
“All else considered, the changes [to the law] are catastrophic,” Magistrate Del Carmen lamented.
For Flores, if the new amparo law is approved in the written terms, it will place even greater responsibility on lawyers, especially now that judges of the judicial branch have been selected by popular vote and have demonstrated “an evident lack of technical expertise in the issues on which they rule,” he said.
“The outlook is discouraging,” Flores acknowledged. “But this means that litigators carry a crucial duty to keep challenging cases with the technical rigor and quality standards that our country deserves.”
Gabriela Solis is a Mexican lawyer turned full-time writer. She was born and raised in Guadalajara and covers business, culture, lifestyle and travel for Mexico News Daily. You can follow her lifestyle blog Dunas y Palmeras.
It is rare for tourists and foreign residents to be affected by violence in Mexico, and homicides on the whole are declining. That said, Mexico News Daily believes it is important that visitors and locals are aware of the security situation in their town. (Mireya Novo/Cuartoscuro)
The popular tourism destinations of Tulum, Acapulco, Zihuatanejo and San Miguel de Allende are among Mexico’s 50 most violent municipalities based on their per capita homicide rates between September 2024 and August 2025.
Other municipalities that make the “50 most violent” list include Manzanillo, Culiacán, Colima, Tijuana and Ciudad Juárez.
The crime data website elcri.men compiles official data and uses it to rank municipalities and states based on their per capita homicide rates.
The latest “50 most violent municipalities” list shows that Huajicori, Nayarit, ranks first with a homicide rate of 278 per 100,000 people in the 12 months between September 2024 and August 2025.
Located in northern Nayarit on the border with both Sinaloa and Durango, Huajicori recorded 34 murders in the year to Aug. 30, according to elcri.men. The municipality has a population of just over 12,000.
Tulum, Acapulco, Zihuatanejo and San Miguel de Allende are popular tourism destinations for Mexican and international tourists, and foreigners live in each of the municipalities.
It is rare for tourists and foreign residents to be affected by violence in the four aforesaid destinations, as most of it is related to organized crime or among rival groups. That said, Mexico News Daily believes it is important that visitors and locals are aware of the security situation, as shown by the official homicide data compiled by elcri.men.
Tulum
The Caribbean coast municipality of Tulum, Quintana Roo, ranks as Mexico’s 20th most violent municipality with a homicide rate of 83.9 per 100,000 residents in the 12 months to Aug. 30.
Tulum, located about 130 kilometers south of Cancún, recorded 46 homicides in the period. The municipality has a population of just under 55,000, according to elcri.men.
The Pacific coast city of Acapulco, Guerrero, ranks as Mexico’s 34th most violent municipality with 71 homicides per 100,000 residents in the year to Aug. 30.
Acapulco, which was once a glamorous vacation destination for Hollywood royalty and “the rich and famous,” has traded its once-shiny reputation for one of crime and violence. (Carlos Alberto Carbajal/Cuartoscuro).
Also located on the Pacific coast of Guerrero, Zihuatanejo de Azueta ranks as Mexico’s 41st most violent municipality with 61.3 homicides per 100,000 people in the year to Aug. 30.
Zihuatanejo, which has an active expat community, recorded 79 murders between September 2024 and August 2025. The municipality has a population of just under 129,000, according to elcri.men.
Among the murder victims in the municipality of Zihuatanejo over the past year was the son of a business leader from Michoacán, who in late August was found dead in a vehicle that was abandoned near the community of El Posquelite.
San Miguel de Allende
Located in the Bajío region state of Guanajuato, San Miguel de Allende ranks as Mexico’s 50th most violent municipality with 49.3 homicides per 100,000 people in the 12 months to Aug. 30.
San Miguel, which has long been home to a sizable community of foreigners, recorded 88 homicides between September 2024 and August 2025. The population of the municipality is 178,576, according to elcri.men.
Among the homicide victims in San Miguel de Allende over the past year were three people who were shot during a religious event in August. Mayor Mauricio Trejo Pureco said that the attack was targeted at three people with significant criminal records. He said that 19 people were wounded in the attack and 16 of them were “good people.”
San Miguel de Allende is one of nine Guanajuato municipalities on the “50 most violent” list compiled by elcri.men.
Guanajuato has been Mexico’s most violent state in recent years based on total homicides.
The 10 most violent municipalities
Mexico’s 10 most violent municipalities based on their per capita homicide rates between September 2024 and August 2025 are as follows:
Huajicori, Nayarit: 278 homicides per 100,000 people.
Santiago Jamiltepec: 171.5 homicides per 100,000 people.
Manzanillo, Colima: 143.4 homicides per 100,000 people.
Huitzilac, Morelos: 132.3 homicides per 100,000 people.
Tarimoro, Guanajuato: 124.5 homicides per 100,000 people.
Salvatierra, Guanajuato: 121.4 homicides per 100,000 people.
Puente de Ixtla, Morelos: 117.9 homicides per 100,000 people.
San Luis Río Colorado, Sonora: 114 homicides per 100,000 people.
Elota, Sinaloa: 105.1 homicides per 100,000 people
Matías Romero Avedaño, Oaxaca: 103.7 homicides per 100,000 people.
Among the other municipalities on the “50 most violent” list are Culiacán, Sinaloa (17th); Colima, Colima (21st); Tecate, Baja California (23rd); Celaya, Guanajuato (35th); Tijuana, Baja California (46th); and Juárez, Chihuahua (49th).
Mexico’s most violent states
Based on homicides per capita, Colima was Mexico’s most violent state between September 2024 and August 2025. The small Pacific coast state recorded 89.2 homicides per 100,000 people, according to elcri.men.
Morelos ranked as the second most violent state with 60 homicides per 100,000 people, followed by Sinaloa (59), Chihuahua (47.8) and Guanajuato (47.6).
Based on total homicides, Guanajuato was the most violent state in the first nine months of 2025. Data presented by the federal government on Tuesday shows that the Bajío region state recorded 2,084 homicides between January and September, accounting for 11.3% of the national murder total.
Ranking second to fifth for total homicides in the period were Chihuahua, Baja California, Sinaloa and México state.